Website review, no card needed

ncdex.com logo

ncdex.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202648 issues · 70 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on ncdex.com, 20 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.8 s3.5 sMay 9Oct 244.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.7 s
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.7 s
Jun 6, 20263.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.7 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.9 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20264.0 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.9 s
Sep 19, 20264.0 s
Sep 26, 20264.0 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20264.3 s
Oct 24, 20264.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
247 ms120 msMay 9Oct 24156 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026209 ms
May 16, 2026200 ms
May 23, 2026218 ms
May 30, 2026224 ms
Jun 6, 2026232 ms
Jun 13, 2026231 ms
Jun 20, 2026203 ms
Jun 27, 2026204 ms
Jul 4, 2026201 ms
Jul 11, 2026201 ms
Jul 18, 2026205 ms
Jul 25, 2026187 ms
Aug 1, 2026170 ms
Aug 8, 2026156 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026135 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026141 ms
Sep 12, 2026145 ms
Sep 19, 2026147 ms
Sep 26, 2026150 ms
Oct 3, 2026150 ms
Oct 10, 2026149 ms
Oct 17, 2026148 ms
Oct 24, 2026156 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ncdex.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ncdex.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. ncdex.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. ncdex.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. ncdex.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. ncdex.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  6. ncdex.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  7. ncdex.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  8. ncdex.com at 7.2 s7.2 s

Speed

5 to fix48
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.1 s · 488 KiB

    About 488 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 80). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    792 ms

    The page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 792 ms. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 170 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 80 but mobile only 48. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Document request latency

    3 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 575 ms

    575 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 575 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Real visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.28

    0.28

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 27.7 s

    27.7 s

    Your largest element takes 27.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.7 s

    15.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.8 s

    28.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 338 ms

    338 ms

    Real visitors wait 338 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.246

    0.246

    The layout shifts by 0.246 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

2 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 209 ms to 156 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 184 ms

    184 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 184 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 173 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 173 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (117), scripts 1.1 MB (21) and fonts 379 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.62 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.62 g of CO₂e: 194.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7750
  • Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)

    Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    3 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

    Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).

  • Positive tabindex

    89 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.

    Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 4 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 8 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 4 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

10 to fixGoogle 9247
  • No page title

    Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://ncdex.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://ncdex.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9288
  • No HTML doctype

    The page has no <!DOCTYPE html>, so browsers render it in quirks mode.

  • 9 distorted images

    9 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • No character set

    No character set is declared, so some characters can render as gibberish.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 0 words

    The homepage has only about 0 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ncdex.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
2003
Headquarters
Mumbai

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on ncdex.com, including 17 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25