Website review, no card needed

neonode.com logo

neonode.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202638 issues · 78 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on neonode.com, 10 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s983 msMay 2Oct 171.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
113 ms76 msMay 2Oct 1798 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202680 ms
May 9, 202682 ms
May 16, 202682 ms
May 23, 202685 ms
May 30, 202694 ms
Jun 6, 202689 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Jun 27, 202688 ms
Jul 4, 202689 ms
Jul 11, 202692 ms
Jul 18, 202693 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 2026100 ms
Aug 8, 2026100 ms
Aug 15, 2026102 ms
Aug 22, 2026107 ms
Aug 29, 2026109 ms
Sep 5, 2026107 ms
Sep 12, 2026105 ms
Sep 19, 202694 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202696 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202698 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of neonode.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. neonode.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. neonode.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. neonode.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. neonode.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. neonode.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. neonode.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. neonode.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. neonode.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix56
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 215 KiB

    About 215 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 334 KiB

    3 images could be 334 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 77). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 480 KiB

    26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (480 KiB).

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and hubspotusercontent-na1.net and others), adding 508 KiB and 667 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 399 ms

    399 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 399 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Cookiebot adds 267 ms

    267 ms

    Cookiebot costs a phone 267 ms of main-thread work and 149 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 277 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 785 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,566 HTML elements

    The page has 1,566 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    Your largest element takes 9.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 80 ms to 98 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 429 ms

    429 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 429 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 791 ms

    791 ms

    Real visitors wait 791 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 37% faster for real visitors

    -37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 48 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 48 requests on a phone: media 3.7 MB (2), scripts 616 KiB (20) and images 557 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Cabin_Safety_1200x900.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    4 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Cabin_Safety_1200x900.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4 KiB.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.45 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.45 g of CO₂e: 173.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9092
  • 26 text elements with low contrast

    26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8570
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (14 characters)

    Your title is only 14 characters: “Neonode | Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Neonode the future of automotive innovation”, “Discover In-cabin Sensing Capabilities” and “Loss Prevention, Age Check and Dynamic Advertising”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 93 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 93 pages on neonode.com and 4 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://neonode.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://neonode.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://neonode.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (729 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://neonode.com/solutions/driver-monitoring, https://neonode.com/solutions/driver-monitoring/hands-on-wheel, https://neonode.com/solutions/driver-monitoring/distraction-detection, https://neonode.com/solutions/driver-monitoring/drowsiness-detection, https://neonode.com/solutions/in-cabin-sensing and https://neonode.com/solutions/in-cabin-sensing/seatbelt-detection and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://neonode.com/newsroom/white-papers has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 15 small tap targets

    15 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 714 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 714 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at neonode.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2008
Headquarters
Stockholm

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on neonode.com, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25