Website review, no card needed

neopharma.com logo

neopharma.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202650 issues · 90 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on neopharma.com, 13 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s1.4 sMay 2Oct 171.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.1 s
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
132 ms107 msMay 2Oct 17111 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026111 ms
May 9, 2026111 ms
May 16, 2026110 ms
May 23, 2026111 ms
May 30, 2026115 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026119 ms
Jun 27, 2026124 ms
Jul 4, 2026129 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026116 ms
Jul 25, 2026113 ms
Aug 1, 2026113 ms
Aug 8, 2026111 ms
Aug 15, 2026112 ms
Aug 22, 2026112 ms
Aug 29, 2026111 ms
Sep 5, 2026115 ms
Sep 12, 2026119 ms
Sep 19, 2026118 ms
Sep 26, 2026118 ms
Oct 3, 2026115 ms
Oct 10, 2026114 ms
Oct 17, 2026111 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of neopharma.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. neopharma.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. neopharma.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. neopharma.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. neopharma.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  5. neopharma.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  6. neopharma.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  7. neopharma.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  8. neopharma.com at 6.2 s6.2 s

Speed

9 to fix70
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.3 s

    49 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 3.6 MB

    92 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.6 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 1.4 MB

    10 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 26). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    614 KiB

    About 614 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Font display

    550 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    310 ms · 78 KiB

    About 78 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Vimeo adds 39 ms

    39 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 39 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Twitter and Vimeo and others), adding 988 KiB and 283 ms of main-thread time.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 138 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 13.0 s

    13.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.0 s

    18.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.22

    0.22

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.22 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.213

    0.213

    The layout shifts by 0.213 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Your largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Since its founding in 2003, Neopharma has emerged as a glob…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.1 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 106 ms

    106 ms

    Real visitors wait 106 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 44% faster for real visitors

    -44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 182 ms

    182 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 182 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 4.9 MB in 150 requests

    4.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 150 requests on a phone: images 3.1 MB (28), scripts 1.4 MB (50) and stylesheets 194 KiB (54). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Global Presence-02.png weighs 978 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    1,010 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Global Presence-02.png at 3,646 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 1,010 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (38 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.38 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.38 g of CO₂e: 165.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 5180
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • 10 images without alt text

    10 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 23 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 33 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 23 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8272
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (203 characters)

    Your meta description is 203 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at neopharma.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 34 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 34 pages on neopharma.com and 6 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Neopharma - Expanding horizons, Extending care”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://neopharma.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://neopharma.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (201 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 14 pages share a title

    /, https://neopharma.com/aboutus.html, https://neopharma.com/ourbusiness.html, https://neopharma.com/api.html, https://neopharma.com/finish.html and https://neopharma.com/quality.html and 8 others all use the title “Neopharma - Expanding horizons, Extending care”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 13 pages share a meta description

    https://neopharma.com/aboutus.html, https://neopharma.com/ourbusiness.html, https://neopharma.com/api.html, https://neopharma.com/finish.html, https://neopharma.com/quality.html and https://neopharma.com/ourscience.html and 7 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    https://neopharma.com/aboutus.html, https://neopharma.com/ourbusiness.html, https://neopharma.com/api.html, https://neopharma.com/finish.html, https://neopharma.com/quality.html and https://neopharma.com/ourscience.html and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 pages with very little text

    https://neopharma.com/news.html, https://neopharma.com/careers.php, https://neopharma.com/contact.html, https://neopharma.com/2024/one2024-9.html and https://neopharma.com/2024/one2024-8.html have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5483
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 156 words

    The homepage has only about 156 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at neopharma.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 50 issues on neopharma.com, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25