Website review, no card needed

nutro.jp logo

nutro.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202645 issues · 79 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on nutro.jp, 19 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s912 msMay 16Sep 263.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
288 ms89 msMay 16Sep 26265 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026128 ms
May 23, 2026125 ms
May 30, 2026124 ms
Jun 6, 2026123 ms
Jun 13, 2026118 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026112 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026157 ms
Jul 18, 2026181 ms
Jul 25, 2026206 ms
Aug 1, 2026214 ms
Aug 8, 2026224 ms
Aug 15, 2026231 ms
Aug 22, 2026222 ms
Aug 29, 2026221 ms
Sep 5, 2026220 ms
Sep 12, 2026234 ms
Sep 19, 2026256 ms
Sep 26, 2026265 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of nutro.jp (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. nutro.jp at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. nutro.jp at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. nutro.jp at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. nutro.jp at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. nutro.jp at 4.3 s4.3 s
  6. nutro.jp at 5.2 s5.2 s
  7. nutro.jp at 6.0 s6.0 s
  8. nutro.jp at 6.9 s6.9 s

Speed

12 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.0 s · 1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.9 s · 676 KiB

    38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (676 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 267 KiB

    About 267 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 2.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 937 ms

    937 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 937 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    262 KiB

    13 images could be 262 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Facebook adds 219 ms

    219 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 219 ms of main-thread work and 366 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • azurefd.net adds 20 ms

    20 ms

    azurefd.net costs a phone 20 ms of main-thread work and 331 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 17 KiB

    17 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 164 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix49
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 46.1 s

    46.1 s

    Your largest element takes 46.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “ニュートロ™はナチュラルフード*を 作り続けて、100年。 * 栄養強化のため、合成ビタミン、ミネラル、アミノ酸使用”.

  • Speed Index: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 54.7 s

    54.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 54.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 625 ms

    625 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 625 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 106% slower for real visitors

    +106%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 265 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 131% slower for real visitors

    +131%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 9.3 MB in 447 requests

    9.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.3 MB in 447 requests on a phone: fonts 4.3 MB (13), scripts 2.9 MB (106) and other files 1.2 MB (263). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    12 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 3_36d37abb-41f5-4fd0-9148-7aa5ac7e3ae6.png at 600 px wide, shown at 190 px. Resized copies would save about 12 KiB.

  • About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.64 g of CO₂e: 317.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8892
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 6153
  • Page is set to noindex

    The robots meta tag says “noindex, follow”: Google is told not to list this page at all.

  • Blocked from indexing

    Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.

  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “ニュートロ™ブランドサイト”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Canonical points to another host

    Your canonical URL points to store.nutro.jp, not nutro.jp, so Google may credit that host instead.

  • Meta description is short (57 characters)

    Your meta description is only 57 characters: “ニュートロ™ブランドサイト総合TOP。ブランド情報TOP、ドッグフードTOP、キャットフードTOPへはこちらから。”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 8 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 8 pages on nutro.jp and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “ニュートロ™はナチュラルフード*を作り続けて、100年。”.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://nutro.jp/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://nutro.jp/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 3 linked pages hidden from search

    https://nutro.jp/pages/brand, https://nutro.jp/pages/dog and https://nutro.jp/pages/cat are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://nutro.jp/pages/swym-wishlist has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://nutro.jp/pages/brand, https://nutro.jp/pages/dog, https://nutro.jp/pages/cat and https://nutro.jp/pages/swym-wishlist have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 internal pages checked

    We fetched 4 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 4 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6983
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 45 words

    The homepage has only about 45 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 24 cookies set on arrival

    24

    Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 48 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nutro.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 1 app. It is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Microsoft Clarity

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on nutro.jp, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25