Website review, no card needed

ocu.org logo

ocu.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202642 issues · 85 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on ocu.org, 12 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.5 sMay 9Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
229 ms195 msMay 9Oct 24223 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026199 ms
May 16, 2026199 ms
May 23, 2026200 ms
May 30, 2026201 ms
Jun 6, 2026202 ms
Jun 13, 2026202 ms
Jun 20, 2026201 ms
Jun 27, 2026201 ms
Jul 4, 2026202 ms
Jul 11, 2026201 ms
Jul 18, 2026200 ms
Jul 25, 2026199 ms
Aug 1, 2026199 ms
Aug 8, 2026201 ms
Aug 15, 2026203 ms
Aug 22, 2026204 ms
Aug 29, 2026205 ms
Sep 5, 2026206 ms
Sep 12, 2026208 ms
Sep 19, 2026210 ms
Sep 26, 2026214 ms
Oct 3, 2026220 ms
Oct 10, 2026222 ms
Oct 17, 2026225 ms
Oct 24, 2026223 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ocu.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ocu.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ocu.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ocu.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ocu.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ocu.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ocu.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ocu.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ocu.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix53
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    42 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    590 ms · 822 KiB

    About 822 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 590 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    800 ms · 218 KiB

    5 images could be 218 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (ec-cloud.org, azurestaticapps.net and Optanon and others), adding 1.4 MB and 707 ms of main-thread time.

  • ec-cloud.org adds 356 ms

    356 ms

    ec-cloud.org costs a phone 356 ms of main-thread work and 637 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • azurestaticapps.net adds 213 ms

    213 ms

    azurestaticapps.net costs a phone 213 ms of main-thread work and 543 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 261 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1,984 HTML elements

    The page has 1,984 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 62 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (62 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    29 KiB

    About 29 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 86 ms

    86 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 86 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Your largest element takes 6.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “regalos ocu”.

  • Speed Index: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 245 ms

    245 ms

    Real visitors wait 245 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 572 ms

    572 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 572 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 199 ms to 223 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix83
  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 143 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 143 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (58), images 584 KiB (19) and stylesheets 129 KiB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    wb-cc-energia-ago-2026.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (130 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (93 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.73 g of CO₂e: 88.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8190
  • ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 19 text elements with low contrast

    19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 53 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7785
  • Meta description is long (209 characters)

    Your meta description is 209 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https://www.ocu.org/-/media/ocu/images/configuration/mo…”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 293 internal links, 45 external

    The homepage links to 293 pages on ocu.org and 45 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “HAZ TU VIDA MÁS FÁCIL”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “OCU. Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ocu.org/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ocu.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.ocu.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,928 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.ocu.org/reclamar/empresas has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.ocu.org/fincas-y-casas, https://www.ocu.org/organizacion, https://www.ocu.org/guio/chat, https://www.ocu.org/reclamar/informacion-consumidores, https://www.ocu.org/reclamar/empresas and https://www.ocu.org/contacto/intervencion have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.ocu.org/posturas-ocu and https://www.ocu.org/guio/chat have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 186 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught SyntaxError: Identifier 'EC' has already been declared”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    27 of 32 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,117 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,117 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 23 cookies set on arrival

    23

    Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ocu.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
COLT Technology Services Group Limited

Company

Founded
1975
Headquarters
Madrid

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on ocu.org, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25