Website review, no card needed

ocz.com logo

ocz.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202632 issues · 83 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on ocz.com, 10 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.3 sMay 2Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms88 msMay 2Oct 1795 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202692 ms
May 9, 202693 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202698 ms
Jun 6, 202698 ms
Jun 13, 202698 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 2026106 ms
Jul 4, 2026110 ms
Jul 11, 2026106 ms
Jul 18, 2026106 ms
Jul 25, 202697 ms
Aug 1, 2026108 ms
Aug 8, 2026114 ms
Aug 15, 2026120 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 202697 ms
Sep 12, 2026104 ms
Sep 19, 2026109 ms
Sep 26, 2026111 ms
Oct 3, 2026109 ms
Oct 10, 2026102 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ocz.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ocz.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ocz.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ocz.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ocz.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ocz.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ocz.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ocz.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ocz.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix65
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 209 KiB

    About 209 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 93). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    610 ms · 135 KiB

    About 135 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    714 KiB

    13 images could be 714 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 111 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (111 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 15 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 15 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, dga.jp and Google Fonts and others), adding 324 KiB and 146 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 65 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 93 but mobile only 65. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 221 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Your largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use strictly necessary cookies and similar technologies …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 952 ms

    952 ms

    Real visitors wait 952 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 71 images without width and height

    71 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.089

    0.089

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.089, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 13 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix83
  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (798 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 10 images below the first screen load straight away

    10 images further down the page (612 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.41 g of CO₂e: 49.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.5 MB in 66 requests

    1.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 873 KiB (35), scripts 423 KiB (16) and stylesheets 128 KiB (7). That is a lean page.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8792
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • <dl> elements must only directly contain properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements (1 element)

    <dl> elements must only directly contain properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 91 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9286
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 124 internal links, 52 external

    The homepage links to 124 pages on ocz.com and 52 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Legacy Personal SSD Products”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Legacy Products | KIOXIA - United States (English)”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://americas.kioxia.com/en-us/personal/support/legacy-products.html.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://americas.kioxia.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://americas.kioxia.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (755 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://americas.kioxia.com/pt-br/top.html, https://americas.kioxia.com/es-lar/top.html and https://americas.kioxia.com/en-us/business/memory/selector.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://americas.kioxia.com/en-us/top.html and https://americas.kioxia.com/en-ca/top.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://americas.kioxia.com/en-us/business/ssd.html and https://americas.kioxia.com/en-us/business/ssd/enterprise-ssd.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8185
  • 17 small tap targets

    17 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://cache.dga.jp/s/tsbmb_api/new_ac.css' from origin 'https://americas.kioxia.com' has…”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 585 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 585 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Quick Start Guide (PDF : 182KB)”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Download SSD Documents” and “Quick Start Guide (PDF : 182KB)”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ocz.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2022.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2002
Headquarters
Sunnyvale

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on ocz.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25