Website review, no card needed
ok.ru website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202648 issues · 83 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on ok.ru, 18 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 325 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 327 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 326 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 327 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 325 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 326 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 327 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 333 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.9 s27 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.9 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.8 s · 561 KiBAbout 561 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.
cdn-vk.ru adds 1.6 s
1.6 scdn-vk.ru costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 4.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40 (desktop: 36). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (cdn-vk.ru, Google Tag Manager and okcdn.ru and others), adding 6.0 MB and 2.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google Tag Manager adds 291 ms
291 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 291 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
okcdn.ru adds 129 ms
129 msokcdn.ru costs a phone 129 ms of main-thread work and 364 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Yandex CDN adds 91 ms
91 msYandex CDN costs a phone 91 ms of main-thread work and 301 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
170 ms · 25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 180 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
116 KiB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (116 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
49 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 139 ms
139 msYour server sent the HTML in 139 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 40.9 s
40.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 40.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.9 s
5.9 sThe first text or image appears after 5.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.9 s
9.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.1 s
6.1 sYour largest element takes 6.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Мы используем cookie-файлы, чтобы улучшить сервисы для вас.…”.
Total Blocking Time: 803 ms
803 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 803 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 328 ms
328 msReal visitors wait 328 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.13
0.13For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 32% slower for real visitors
+32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 5.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 317 ms to 333 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.2 MB in 420 requests
6.2 MBYour homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 420 requests on a phone: scripts 4.6 MB (299), other files 769 KiB (80) and stylesheets 629 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.77 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.77 g of CO₂e: 212.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (87 characters)
Your title is 87 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “OK social network. Communication with friends on OK. Your meeting place with classmates”.
Meta description is long (198 characters)
Your meta description is 198 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://ok.ru/sitemap-index-game.xml.gz, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
36 internal links, 24 external
The homepage links to 36 pages on ok.ru and 24 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ok.ru/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://ok.ru/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
2 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to https://ok.ru/null and https://ok.ru/dk, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
3 linked pages hidden from search
https://ok.ru/cookiepolicy, https://ok.ru/agreementpage and https://ok.ru/rtterms are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
7 pages share 3 titles
/ and https://ok.ru/video all use the title “OK social network. Communication with friends on OK. Your meeting pla…”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
https://ok.ru/cookiepolicy, https://ok.ru/agreementpage and https://ok.ru/rtterms have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://ok.ru/gifts/catalog/all and https://ok.ru/gifts use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://ok.ru/video, whose canonical is https://ok.ru/video/showcase. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
6 pages without an H1
https://ok.ru/discovery, https://ok.ru/cookiepolicy, https://ok.ru/groups, https://ok.ru/games, https://ok.ru/agreementpage and https://ok.ru/rtterms have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://ok.ru/games has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 pages slow to respond
https://ok.ru/help, https://ok.ru/ok and https://ok.ru/agreementpage took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://r.mradx.net/imgs/18/5b/9600c4780c869935.png.
2 small tap targets
2 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 44 words
The homepage has only about 44 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “We apply recommended technologies More”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “We apply recommended technologies More” and “Sign up”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ok.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on ok.ru, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.