Website review, no card needed

omaze.com logo

omaze.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202630 issues · 76 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on omaze.com, 6 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s472 msMay 16Oct 31535 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026910 ms
May 23, 2026931 ms
May 30, 2026845 ms
Jun 6, 2026852 ms
Jun 13, 2026742 ms
Jun 20, 2026713 ms
Jun 27, 2026706 ms
Jul 4, 2026681 ms
Jul 11, 2026647 ms
Jul 18, 2026654 ms
Jul 25, 2026772 ms
Aug 1, 2026824 ms
Aug 8, 2026887 ms
Aug 15, 2026953 ms
Aug 22, 2026875 ms
Aug 29, 2026860 ms
Sep 5, 2026719 ms
Sep 12, 2026686 ms
Sep 19, 2026686 ms
Sep 26, 2026639 ms
Oct 3, 2026669 ms
Oct 10, 2026626 ms
Oct 17, 2026636 ms
Oct 24, 2026591 ms
Oct 31, 2026535 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
116 ms75 msMay 16Oct 3194 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026111 ms
May 23, 202698 ms
May 30, 202682 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202689 ms
Jun 27, 202699 ms
Jul 4, 202689 ms
Jul 11, 202688 ms
Jul 18, 202688 ms
Jul 25, 202680 ms
Aug 1, 202684 ms
Aug 8, 202688 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 2026110 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 202695 ms
Sep 19, 202693 ms
Sep 26, 202686 ms
Oct 3, 202683 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202692 ms
Oct 24, 202692 ms
Oct 31, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of omaze.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. omaze.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. omaze.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. omaze.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. omaze.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. omaze.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. omaze.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. omaze.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. omaze.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix74
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.1 s · 2.9 MB

    67 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.9 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    600 ms · 975 KiB

    23 images could be 975 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 212 KiB

    About 212 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 74

    74/100

    Your mobile performance score is 74. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (posthog.com, Google Tag Manager and Optanon and others), adding 471 KiB and 219 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 75 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    16 KiB

    About 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    15 KiB

    15 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 361 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.5 s

    12.5 s

    Your largest element takes 12.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.0 s

    13.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Speed Index: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

11 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.5 s

    0.5 s

    Real visitors wait 0.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 94 ms

    94 ms

    Real visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.4 s

    0.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 103 ms

    103 ms

    Real visitors wait 103 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 39% faster for real visitors

    -39%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 55 ms

    55 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 55 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 83 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 83 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (54), scripts 435 KiB (13) and fonts 130 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 28 images below the first screen load straight away

    28 images further down the page (2.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    60 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example uk-feb-26.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 60 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (252 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.92 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 110.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 8595
  • 64 images without alt text

    64 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 29 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 31 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 29 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 8268
  • Title is short (5 characters)

    Your title is only 5 characters: “Omaze”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 8 H1 headlines

    There are 8 <h1> headlines (“Win life-changing prizesHelp world-changing causes”, “Making Dreams Come True for Over a Decade” and “Making Dreams Come True for Over a Decade”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://omaze.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at omaze.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 10 links with vague text

    10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 9 internal links, 31 external

    The homepage links to 9 pages on omaze.com and 31 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “Ever wondered how to meet a celebrity, win a trip, or get in on luxury car bidding? Omaze has an online sweepstakes for…”.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://omaze.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,837 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 6 pages share a title

    /, https://omaze.com/about.html, https://omaze.com/careers.html, https://omaze.com/team.html, https://omaze.com/story.html and https://omaze.com/privacy.html all use the title “Omaze”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://omaze.com/about.html, https://omaze.com/careers.html, https://omaze.com/team.html, https://omaze.com/story.html and https://omaze.com/privacy.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://omaze.com/privacy.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 internal pages checked

    We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 5 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 5 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7791
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 14 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,281 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,281 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and PostHog.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at omaze.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | PostHog
Hosting
AWS

Hiring

Hiring
5 open roles
Teams
Marketing (2), Growth (1), Product (1), Technology (1)
Job board
ashby

Company

Founded
2012
Headquarters
Culver City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on omaze.com, including 8 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25