Website review, no card needed
optotech.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202639 issues · 81 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on optotech.net, 17 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 130 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.7 s
2.3 s
2.9 s
3.5 s
4.0 s
4.6 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 735 KiBAbout 735 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 1.5 MB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 1.2 MB14 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Hubspot, Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics CMP and others), adding 2.3 MB and 233 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
380 ms · 63 KiBAbout 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 380 ms faster on a phone.
reaze.cloud adds 1 ms
1 msreaze.cloud costs a phone 1 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hubspot adds 122 ms
122 msHubspot costs a phone 122 ms of main-thread work and 394 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 230 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.8 s
A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 875 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 121 ms
121 msYour server sent the HTML in 121 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.6 s
9.6 sYour largest element takes 9.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “OptoTech ist Teil der Schunk Group und gilt im Kreis der Op…”.
Time to Interactive: 14.0 s
14.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.1 s
9.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sThe first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 215 ms
215 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 215 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 126 ms
126 msReal visitors wait 126 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors
-24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.085
0.085The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.085, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.1 MB in 72 requests
3.1 MBYour homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 72 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (25), scripts 1.3 MB (16) and stylesheets 56 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (792 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.87 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.87 g of CO₂e: 103.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Form elements must have labels (1 element)
Form elements must have labels: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
14 images without alt text
14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (40 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 40 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (15 characters)
Your title is only 15 characters: “Home | OptoTech”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
98 internal links, 26 external
The homepage links to 98 pages on optotech.net and 26 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Willkommen bei OptoTech”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.optotech.net/de.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.optotech.net/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.optotech.net/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (657 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages share 2 titles
https://www.optotech.net/de, https://www.optotech.net/en and https://www.optotech.net/es all use the title “Home | OptoTech”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
13 pages without a meta description
https://www.optotech.net/en, https://www.optotech.net/es, https://www.optotech.net/de/produkte, https://www.optotech.net/de/produkte/feinoptik, https://www.optotech.net/de/produkte/brillenoptik and https://www.optotech.net/de/produkte/messtechnik and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.optotech.net/de/anwendungsbereiche/brillenglaeser-kunststoff took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 43 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'getRegistrations')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
21 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 376 words of copy
The homepage carries about 376 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Usercentrics
A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at optotech.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on optotech.net, including 19 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.