Website review, no card needed

opus.inc logo

opus.inc website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202650 issues · 87 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on opus.inc, 23 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.9 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 244.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20267.7 s
May 16, 20267.9 s
May 23, 20268.1 s
May 30, 20268.2 s
Jun 6, 20268.0 s
Jun 13, 20267.8 s
Jun 20, 20267.3 s
Jun 27, 20266.7 s
Jul 4, 20265.9 s
Jul 11, 20264.6 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20264.0 s
Oct 24, 20264.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
306 ms115 msMay 9Oct 24162 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026239 ms
May 16, 2026262 ms
May 23, 2026268 ms
May 30, 2026284 ms
Jun 6, 2026283 ms
Jun 13, 2026274 ms
Jun 20, 2026253 ms
Jun 27, 2026225 ms
Jul 4, 2026173 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026138 ms
Jul 25, 2026142 ms
Aug 1, 2026158 ms
Aug 8, 2026184 ms
Aug 15, 2026216 ms
Aug 22, 2026237 ms
Aug 29, 2026214 ms
Sep 5, 2026203 ms
Sep 12, 2026229 ms
Sep 19, 2026179 ms
Sep 26, 2026180 ms
Oct 3, 2026189 ms
Oct 10, 2026170 ms
Oct 17, 2026171 ms
Oct 24, 2026162 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of opus.inc (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. opus.inc at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. opus.inc at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. opus.inc at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. opus.inc at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. opus.inc at 4.9 s4.9 s
  6. opus.inc at 5.9 s5.9 s
  7. opus.inc at 6.9 s6.9 s
  8. opus.inc at 7.9 s7.9 s

Speed

11 to fix52
  • Improve image delivery

    33.8 s · 9.2 MB

    12 images could be 9.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 33.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 545 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (545 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 331 KiB

    About 331 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.0 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.0 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and jQuery CDN and others), adding 1.7 MB and 742 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 449 ms

    449 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 449 ms of main-thread work and 558 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    440 ms · 47 KiB

    About 47 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 440 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 299 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • site.com adds 14 ms

    14 ms

    site.com costs a phone 14 ms of main-thread work and 751 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    12 KiB

    12 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 735 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 43.6 s

    43.6 s

    Your largest element takes 43.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Alameda Opus”.

  • Time to Interactive: 43.6 s

    43.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 43.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 365 ms

    365 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 365 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 162 ms

    162 ms

    Real visitors wait 162 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 34% faster for real visitors

    -34%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 239 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 47% faster for real visitors

    -47%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 7.7 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.073

    0.073

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.073, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 12.4 MB in 88 requests

    12.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.4 MB in 88 requests on a phone: images 10.4 MB (21), scripts 1.6 MB (40) and fonts 184 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 8.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    4.2 MB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example design-sem-nome-(1)[1920x700].png at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4.2 MB.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (10.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (2.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.52 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.52 g of CO₂e: 422.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8590
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 15 tap targets too small

    15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (33 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 33 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 form fields without a label

    9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9269
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (511 characters)

    Your meta description is 511 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://opus.inc/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at opus.inc/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 36 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on opus.inc and 6 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Opus Incorporadora - Apartamentos de alto padrão em Goiânia.”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix81
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://opus.inc/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (342 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://opus.inc/conheca-a-opus-incorporadora, https://opus.inc/decorados, https://opus.inc/blog, https://opus.inc/contato, https://opus.inc/revenda and https://opus.inc/politica-de-privacidade and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    https://opus.inc/decorados, https://opus.inc/politica-de-privacidade, https://opus.inc/imovel/lancamento/alameda-opus, https://opus.inc/imovel/lancamento/opus-zoom-145, https://opus.inc/opus-ayra-reserva-ybiti and https://opus.inc/noticia/opus-ayra-morar-na-reserva-ybiti-com-equilibrio-funcionalidade-e-conexao-com-a-natureza took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 8870
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://opus.inc/.

  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://opus.my.site.com/ESWSiteOpusChat1791398331691/assets/styles/bootstrap.min.css' fro…”.

  • Pasting is blocked

    A form field blocks pasting, which frustrates password managers and people on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 317 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 317 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at opus.inc, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Servicos de Internet SA

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 50 issues on opus.inc, including 21 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25