Website review, no card needed
orionedutech.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202645 issues · 73 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on orionedutech.com, 17 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 115 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.4 s
1.9 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.4 s
3.9 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 6.8 MB64 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.8 MB).
Improve image delivery
200 ms · 5.1 MB19 images could be 5.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 68
68/100Your mobile performance score is 68. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (FontAwesome CDN, dunsregistered.com and Google Fonts and others), adding 7.1 MB and 13 ms of main-thread time.
Amazon Web Services adds 0 ms
0 msAmazon Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 6.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
190 ms · 33 KiBAbout 33 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 190 ms faster on a phone.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 81 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
12 KiBAbout 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 138 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.0 s
6.0 sYour largest element takes 6.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We are India's Leading Skilling & Staffing Company”. Most of its time is resource load duration (2.5 s).
Speed Index: 6.3 s
6.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
38 images without width and height
38 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Time to Interactive: 6.2 s
6.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 116 ms
116 msReal visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 16 ms
16 msScripts block the page for only 16 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.8 MB in 89 requests
7.8 MBYour homepage downloads 7.8 MB in 89 requests on a phone: images 7.5 MB (72), fonts 181 KiB (4) and scripts 112 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images far larger than shown
2.0 MB11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example apprenticeship.jpg at 3,497 px wide, shown at 240 px. Resized copies would save about 2.0 MB.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
17 images in older formats
17 images (2.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
22 images below the first screen load straight away
22 images further down the page (2.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit
2.21 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.21 g of CO₂e: 265.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (2 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (13 characters)
Your title is only 13 characters: “Orion Edutech”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (39 characters)
Your meta description is only 39 characters: “Web site created using create-react-app”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.orionedutech.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
1 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 540 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.orionedutech.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://res.cloudinary.com/learnhat/image/upload/v1640674377/orion-new-website/unnamed_White_tpwamo.png.
11 small tap targets
11 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 540 words of copy
The homepage carries about 540 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at orionedutech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Netlify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on orionedutech.com, including 14 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.