Website review, no card needed
outlanderstore.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202637 issues · 88 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on outlanderstore.com, 14 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82B- #24,737 of 88,850 reviewed websitesbeats 67%
- #15,357 of 46,251 online storesbeats 60%
- #14,766 of 41,514 Shopify storesbeats 57%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 779 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 750 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 732 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 728 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 750 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 799 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 814 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 876 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 896 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 880 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 838 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 826 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 808 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 818 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 842 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 828 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 805 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 794 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 796 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 818 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 832 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 833 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 797 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 772 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 767 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 88 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.5 s
2.3 s
3.0 s
3.8 s
4.5 s
5.3 s
6.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.6 s · 1,021 KiBAbout 1,021 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.6 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 249 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (249 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
3,229 HTML elements
The page has 3,229 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 607 KiB11 images could be 607 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Shopify and others), adding 1.8 MB and 892 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 534 ms
534 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 534 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 45 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 86 KiBAbout 86 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 136 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.3 s
23.3 sYour largest element takes 23.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 23.5 s
23.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.7 s
11.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 388 ms
388 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 388 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 88 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 393 ms
393 msReal visitors wait 393 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 321 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 321 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (99), images 2.1 MB (33) and other files 918 KiB (152). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (64 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.59 g of CO₂e: 191.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (3 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (482 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 482 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (3 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 12 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (81 characters)
Your title is 81 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “OutlanderStore.com | The Official Shop of Outlander: The Series – Outlander Store”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
191 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 191 pages on outlanderstore.com and 6 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Buy Outlander apparel, replica jewelry, bags, bedding, home decor, and more at OutlanderStore.com, the official store o…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “<img src="//www.outlanderstore.com/cdn/shop/t/327/assets/HBO_FInalLogo.svg?v=43615" alt="Logo" itemprop="logo" style="m…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.outlanderstore.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.outlanderstore.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (882 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
/collections/new-arrivals, /collections/clothing, /collections/shirts, /collections/hoodies-jackets, /collections/bottoms and /collections/replica-apparel and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 88 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
105 of 118 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 1,088 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,088 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “track my order”, “SHOP NOW” and “shop now”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 94 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
45 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at outlanderstore.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Freegifts · azureedge.net · elfsight.com · stamped.io · b-cdn.net · hextom.com · bogos.io · kount.com · kxcdn.com · Swym Wishlist Plus
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- New York
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on outlanderstore.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.