Website review, no card needed

Overdose logo

overdose.digital website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202620 issues · 72 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on overdose.digital, 3 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

Read the full growth playbook for Overdose

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
101 ms75 msJun 27Jul 2588 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 27, 202688 ms
Jul 4, 202688 ms
Jul 11, 202688 ms
Jul 18, 202688 ms
Jul 25, 202688 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of overdose.digital (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. overdose.digital at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. overdose.digital at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. overdose.digital at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. overdose.digital at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. overdose.digital at 4.9 s4.9 s
  6. overdose.digital at 5.8 s5.8 s
  7. overdose.digital at 6.8 s6.8 s
  8. overdose.digital at 7.8 s7.8 s

Speed

7 to fix87
  • Mobile performance score: 87

    87/100

    Your mobile performance score is 87 (desktop: 75). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Cookiebot and others), adding 750 KiB and 502 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 292 KiB

    About 292 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 333 ms

    333 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 333 ms of main-thread work and 513 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,895 HTML elements

    The page has 1,895 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    199 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (199 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 43 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    122 KiB

    About 122 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 105 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    6 KiB

    1 image could be 6 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 36 ms

    36 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 36 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.6 s

    12.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Your largest element takes 3.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Strategy, design, technology, media, search and data for am…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.6 s).

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 88 ms to 88 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 770 ms

    770 ms

    Real visitors wait 770 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 161 ms

    161 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 161 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025

    0.025

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix97
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    od_controller.svg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.55 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.55 g of CO₂e: 66.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.9 MB in 91 requests

    1.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 91 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (34), images 799 KiB (23) and fonts 46 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 10098
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 62 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10095
  • Meta description is short (45 characters)

    Your meta description is only 45 characters: “Overdose is a global digital commerce agency.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 142 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 142 pages on overdose.digital and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “COMMERCE BUILTTO TRADE.Commerce built to trade.”.

  • Title: 34 characters

    Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Overdose — Digital Commerce Agency”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://overdose.digital/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://overdose.digital/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://overdose.digital/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,394 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 66 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • A 9-field form

    Your longest form asks for 9 fields (5 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 847 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 847 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Get in Touch”, “STIHL SHOP” and “Pre-register for Melbourne”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks, 41 customer or partner logos and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at overdose.digital, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 20 issues on overdose.digital, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25