Website review, no card needed
patriziapepe.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202641 issues · 101 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on patriziapepe.com, 15 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82B- #21,822 of 80,566 reviewed websitesbeats 67%
- #12,916 of 39,626 online storesbeats 61%
- #24 of 257 Salesforce Commerce Cloud storesbeats 89%
Closest competitors among Salesforce Commerce Cloud stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 177 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 204 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
patriziapepe.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 2.4 MB9 images could be 2.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and iubenda and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 705 KiBAbout 705 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 60
60/100Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 70 KiBAbout 70 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 500 ms.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,172 HTML elements
The page has 2,172 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
183 KiB24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (183 KiB).
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 142 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.5 s
12.5 sYour largest element takes 12.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 20.7 s
20.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.2 s
6.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 386 ms
386 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 386 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 177 ms to 204 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.5 MB in 138 requests
5.5 MBYour homepage downloads 5.5 MB in 138 requests on a phone: images 3.4 MB (56), scripts 1.8 MB (34) and fonts 152 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 2.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
2.2 MB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Matching_Sets_EDITORIAL_2.jpg at 6,060 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 2.2 MB.
11 images in older formats
11 images (3.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (2.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.55 g of CO₂e: 186.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
12 tap targets too small
12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA progressbar nodes must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA progressbar nodes must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("/on/demandware.static/Sites-patriziapepe_US-Site/-/defa…”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.patriziapepe.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
403 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 403 pages on patriziapepe.com and 8 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 102 characters
Your meta description is 102 characters: “Buy Patrizia Pepe Collection: Apparel and Accessories for Women and Men. Discover our Online Boutique!”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “PATRIZIA PEPE”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Patrizia Pepe | Apparel and Accessories for Women and Men”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.patriziapepe.com/us/en/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,130 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 195 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=12000927&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=4c61c40a-3003-4410-af44-32377fb239b3&bo=2&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=390&sh=844&sc=24&nwd=1&tl=Patrizia%20Pepe%20%7C%20Apparel%20and%20Acces.
41 small tap targets
41 of 84 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
67 distorted images
67 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://patriziapepe.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (patriziapepe.com).
Valid certificate (178 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · Thawte EV RSA CA G2 verifies for patriziapepe.com and is valid for another 178 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://patriziapepe.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 48 links work
All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors; 4 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 37 days
patriziapepe.com is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
patriziapepe.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
patriziapepe.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearspatriziapepe.com was registered in Dec 1997 through Register SPA. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 522 words of copy
The homepage carries about 522 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SIGN UP AND BE THE FIRST TO GET THE NEWS” and “LEARN MORE AND CUSTOMIZE”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Sign up and be the first to get the news”, “Apply” and “SHOP NOW”.
6 short forms
6 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:212.19.117.8 a:production.eu01.tessilform.demandware.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.atl…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads, Microsoft Clarity and Xandr (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: iubenda
A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Leonet As It Uan Company S.R.L.
Company
- Founded
- 1993
- Headquarters
- Campi Bisenzio
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on patriziapepe.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.