Website review, no card needed

paulsmiths.edu logo

paulsmiths.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202633 issues · 83 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on paulsmiths.edu, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s989 msMay 16Oct 311.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.0 s
May 23, 20261.0 s
May 30, 20261.0 s
Jun 6, 20261.0 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.0 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Oct 31, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
160 ms119 msMay 16Oct 31155 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026137 ms
May 23, 2026137 ms
May 30, 2026138 ms
Jun 6, 2026138 ms
Jun 13, 2026133 ms
Jun 20, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 2026131 ms
Jul 4, 2026130 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026126 ms
Jul 25, 2026124 ms
Aug 1, 2026127 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026143 ms
Aug 29, 2026148 ms
Sep 5, 2026151 ms
Sep 12, 2026153 ms
Sep 19, 2026150 ms
Sep 26, 2026147 ms
Oct 3, 2026147 ms
Oct 10, 2026147 ms
Oct 17, 2026148 ms
Oct 24, 2026155 ms
Oct 31, 2026155 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of paulsmiths.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. paulsmiths.edu at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. paulsmiths.edu at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. paulsmiths.edu at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. paulsmiths.edu at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. paulsmiths.edu at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. paulsmiths.edu at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. paulsmiths.edu at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. paulsmiths.edu at 4.9 s4.9 s

Speed

12 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    21.5 s · 3.3 MB

    About 3.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 21.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.1 s · 140 KiB

    About 140 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 365 KiB

    22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (365 KiB).

  • YouTube adds 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 3.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Vimeo and others), adding 17.4 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Vimeo adds 164 ms

    164 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 164 ms of main-thread work and 11.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    793 KiB

    9 images could be 793 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 555 ms

    555 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 555 ms of main-thread work and 993 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 48 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 48 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 142 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 25.3 s

    25.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 25.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 40.2 s

    40.2 s

    Your largest element takes 40.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “paul smith's college”.

  • Speed Index: 25.3 s

    25.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 25.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 47.2 s

    47.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 47.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 381 ms

    381 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 381 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 155 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 165 ms

    165 ms

    Real visitors wait 165 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 476 ms

    476 ms

    Real visitors wait 476 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 19.6 MB in 203 requests

    19.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.6 MB in 203 requests on a phone: other files 11.1 MB (81), scripts 5.9 MB (56) and images 1.7 MB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    c3-814x810.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (457 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 5.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.57 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.57 g of CO₂e: 668.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9899
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10083
  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Home - Paul Smith's College”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Paul Smith's College” and “Adventure Inside Academics”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (436 characters)

    Your meta description is 436 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 94 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 94 pages on paulsmiths.edu and 15 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.paulsmiths.edu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.paulsmiths.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.paulsmiths.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,122 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.paulsmiths.edu/events and https://www.paulsmiths.edu/event/winter-open-house-2027 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.paulsmiths.edu/events took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 57 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5483
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 7 third-party cookies

    7 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 22 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 679 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 679 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Request Information”, “Apply” and “Request Info”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 23 cookies set on arrival

    23

    Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at paulsmiths.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
WP Engine

Company

Employees
150
Founded
1946
Headquarters
Paul Smiths

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on paulsmiths.edu, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25