Website review, no card needed

pbserum.com logo

pbserum.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202640 issues · 84 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on pbserum.com, 20 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.6 s4.3 sMay 2Oct 174.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20265.4 s
May 9, 20265.2 s
May 16, 20265.1 s
May 23, 20265.0 s
May 30, 20265.0 s
Jun 6, 20264.8 s
Jun 13, 20264.6 s
Jun 20, 20264.5 s
Jun 27, 20264.5 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.8 s
Jul 25, 20264.8 s
Aug 1, 20264.8 s
Aug 8, 20264.8 s
Aug 15, 20264.7 s
Aug 22, 20264.7 s
Aug 29, 20264.5 s
Sep 5, 20264.4 s
Sep 12, 20264.6 s
Sep 19, 20264.6 s
Sep 26, 20264.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.9 s
Oct 10, 20264.8 s
Oct 17, 20264.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
94 ms81 msMay 2Oct 1783 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202684 ms
May 9, 202685 ms
May 16, 202685 ms
May 23, 202685 ms
May 30, 202685 ms
Jun 6, 202684 ms
Jun 13, 202685 ms
Jun 20, 202685 ms
Jun 27, 202682 ms
Jul 4, 202686 ms
Jul 11, 202692 ms
Jul 18, 202691 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202690 ms
Aug 8, 202686 ms
Aug 15, 202684 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202682 ms
Sep 5, 202686 ms
Sep 12, 202686 ms
Sep 19, 202686 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202685 ms
Oct 10, 202684 ms
Oct 17, 202683 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pbserum.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pbserum.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. pbserum.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. pbserum.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. pbserum.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. pbserum.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. pbserum.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. pbserum.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. pbserum.com at 5.7 s5.7 s

Speed

8 to fix54
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.8 s · 9.1 MB

    59 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.1 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    4.3 s · 7.6 MB

    17 images could be 7.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 330 KiB

    About 330 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 58). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Facebook and others), adding 868 KiB and 772 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 374 ms

    374 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 374 ms of main-thread work and 528 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Cookiebot adds 253 ms

    253 ms

    Cookiebot costs a phone 253 ms of main-thread work and 78 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 163 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    46 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    12 KiB

    About 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 743 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Real visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.6 s

    12.6 s

    Your largest element takes 12.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.6 s

    35.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 370 ms

    370 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 370 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 84 ms to 83 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.4 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 78 ms

    78 ms

    Real visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 9.7 MB in 84 requests

    9.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.7 MB in 84 requests on a phone: images 8.6 MB (30), scripts 1.0 MB (29) and fonts 49 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images over 500 KB

    9 images weigh 7.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    772 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example doctors.png at 1,000 px wide, shown at 250 px. Resized copies would save about 772 KiB.

  • 17 images in older formats

    17 images (8.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 16 images below the first screen load straight away

    16 images further down the page (7.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.76 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.76 g of CO₂e: 330.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8289
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 14 tap targets too small

    14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)

    Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 11 links without text

    11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 30 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 7782
  • No page title

    Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

  • 9 links with vague text

    9 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 65 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 65 pages on pbserum.com and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 124 characters

    Your meta description is 124 characters: “pbserum is the first and only therapeutic procedure based on recombinant enzymes that has revolutionized aesthetic medi…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Discover the Bioremodeling Era”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pbserum.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pbserum.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://pbserum.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (683 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 15 pages without a title

    https://pbserum.com/enzymes, https://pbserum.com/products-ranges/smartker, https://pbserum.com/products-ranges/specific, https://pbserum.com/products-ranges/plus, https://pbserum.com/products-ranges/ha and https://pbserum.com/products-ranges/ha-corrector and 9 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://pbserum.com/blog/pbserum-inaugurates-the-bioremodeling-era-at-imcas-paris-2026 and https://pbserum.com/blog/solutions-for-hydration-deficiency-in-dry-skin-during-winter use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://pbserum.com/about-us has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 669 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 669 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pbserum.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on pbserum.com, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25