Website review, no card needed

pennbeer.com logo

pennbeer.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202627 issues · 72 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on pennbeer.com, 9 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s1.4 sMay 2Oct 172.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
74 ms61 msMay 2Oct 1772 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202665 ms
May 9, 202667 ms
May 16, 202670 ms
May 23, 202670 ms
May 30, 202669 ms
Jun 6, 202668 ms
Jun 13, 202667 ms
Jun 20, 202663 ms
Jun 27, 202663 ms
Jul 4, 202662 ms
Jul 11, 202662 ms
Jul 18, 202662 ms
Jul 25, 202663 ms
Aug 1, 202662 ms
Aug 8, 202663 ms
Aug 15, 202662 ms
Aug 22, 202663 ms
Aug 29, 202663 ms
Sep 5, 202663 ms
Sep 12, 202665 ms
Sep 19, 202664 ms
Sep 26, 202663 ms
Oct 3, 202665 ms
Oct 10, 202666 ms
Oct 17, 202672 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pennbeer.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pennbeer.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. pennbeer.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. pennbeer.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. pennbeer.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. pennbeer.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. pennbeer.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. pennbeer.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  8. pennbeer.com at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

2 to fix73
  • Mobile performance score: 73

    73/100

    Your mobile performance score is 73 (desktop: 97). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (23 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    164 KiB

    2 images could be 164 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Analytics and Adobe TypeKit and others), adding 309 KiB and 112 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 75 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    30 KiB

    About 30 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 169 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Your largest element takes 4.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (3.0 s).

  • Speed Index: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 40% slower for real visitors

    +40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 65 ms to 72 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 72 ms

    72 ms

    Real visitors wait 72 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.022

    0.022

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.022, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (177 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.55 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.55 g of CO₂e: 66.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.9 MB in 41 requests

    1.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 41 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (22), fonts 240 KiB (9) and scripts 86 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9194
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 13 images without alt text

    13 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9280
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Home – Penn Beer”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 32 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 32 pages on pennbeer.com and 4 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Are you 21 or Older?”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pennbeer.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pennbeer.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://pennbeer.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://pennbeer.com/our-team and //our-team all use the title “Our Team – Penn Beer”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://pennbeer.com/about-us, https://pennbeer.com/our-team, https://pennbeer.com/employment, https://pennbeer.com/portfolio, https://pennbeer.com/online-ordering and https://pennbeer.com/suppliers and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example //our-team, whose canonical is https://pennbeer.com/our-team. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    https://pennbeer.com/portfolio, https://pennbeer.com/online-ordering, https://pennbeer.com/suppliers and https://pennbeer.com/contact have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 84 words

    The homepage has only about 84 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pennbeer.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2015.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on pennbeer.com, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25