Website review, no card needed
perlesandco.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202639 issues · 89 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on perlesandco.com, 19 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 118 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
3.0 s
3.7 s
4.3 s
4.9 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.5 s · 754 KiB97 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (754 KiB).
Improve image delivery
2.3 s · 852 KiB15 images could be 852 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Mobile performance score: 21
21/100Your mobile performance score is 21 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4,639 HTML elements
The page has 4,639 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
980 ms · 511 KiBAbout 511 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 980 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google CDN adds 172 ms
172 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 172 ms of main-thread work and 295 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Optanon and Hotjar and others), adding 743 KiB and 419 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
200 ms · 54 KiBAbout 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 205 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 58 but mobile only 21. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.28
0.28For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.9 s
27.9 sYour largest element takes 27.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 28.5 s
28.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.856
0.856The layout shifts by 0.856 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 11.2 s
11.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
120 images without width and height
120 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 556 ms
556 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 556 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 118 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 151 ms
151 msReal visitors wait 151 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 638 ms
638 msReal visitors wait 638 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 206 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 206 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (111), fonts 1.1 MB (8) and scripts 1.1 MB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Slide_mobile_promos_oct26_fr.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
3 images in older formats
3 images (608 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
9 images far larger than shown
394 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Slide_mobile_promos_oct26_fr.png at 1,127 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 394 KiB.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.86 g of CO₂e: 223.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Unlabelled dropdowns
2 dropdowns have no label.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (204 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 204 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
42 form fields without a label
42 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (28 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 28 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 233 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Perles&Co Tout le matériel pour créer vos bijoux fantaisie & Tutos DIY”.
Meta description is long (162 characters)
Your meta description is 162 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
536 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 536 pages on perlesandco.com and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Boutique en ligne de perles et accessoires pour la création de bijoux DIY et autres loisirs créatifs”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.perlesandco.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: OnlineStore, Product and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.perlesandco.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.perlesandco.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,307 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
/, https://www.perlesandco.com/nouveautes and https://www.perlesandco.com/specials.php all use the title “Perles&Co Tout le matériel pour créer vos bijoux fantaisie & Tutos DIY”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.perlesandco.com/nouveautes and https://www.perlesandco.com/specials.php use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 198 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
47 small tap targets
47 of 156 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,688 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,688 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Aide et contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 72 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at perlesandco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Company
- Founded
- 2004
- Headquarters
- Albi
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on perlesandco.com, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.