Website review, no card needed
pestban.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202628 issues · 85 checks
This review found 28 issues worth fixing on pestban.com, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 88 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.3 s · 515 KiBAbout 515 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
Improve image delivery
1.4 s · 297 KiB6 images could be 297 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 353 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (353 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 74). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5,302 HTML elements
The page has 5,302 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Facebook and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 130 KiBAbout 130 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 428 ms
428 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 428 ms of main-thread work and 691 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.7 s
A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 144 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
39 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 39 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 74 but mobile only 45. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.9 s
22.9 sYour largest element takes 22.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Buggin Halloween 2026”.
Time to Interactive: 25.2 s
25.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.3 s
10.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 818 ms
818 msReal visitors wait 818 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 471 ms
471 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 471 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 91 ms
91 msReal visitors wait 91 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 88 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.027
0.027The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.027, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.1 MB in 126 requests
4.1 MBYour homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 126 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (46), images 1.6 MB (26) and fonts 411 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images in older formats
7 images (416 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.16 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.16 g of CO₂e: 139.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (1 element)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
35 links without text
35 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 48 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (105 characters)
Your title is 105 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Pest Control Atlanta, GA | Top-Rated Exterminators | Pest Management in Atlanta, Augusta …”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Affordable Pest Control & Top-Rated Exterminators…” and “Affordable Pest Control & Top-Rated Exterminators…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
304 internal links, 43 external
The homepage links to 304 pages on pestban.com and 43 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 158 characters
Your meta description is 158 characters: “Peachtree Pest Control is one of the top-rated exterminators in the Atlanta, GA area. Click or call us for affordable p…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.peachtreepestcontrol.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, HomeAndConstructionBusiness, LocalBusiness, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.peachtreepestcontrol.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details; logo would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,442 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.peachtreepestcontrol.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 30 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 103 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=73009594&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=4c3c61c1-a3a9-4d8d-affa-b172ab1b1f3b&bo=1&sid=28090f70ce3511f1843cefc2bbefdf5d&vid=28092730ce3511f1ae12359d7ec568f0&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
8 small tap targets
8 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 40 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
About 639 words of copy
The homepage carries about 639 words of visible text.
9 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Call: 855-732-2487” and “CONTACT”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Call: 855-732-2487”, “Contact” and “Get A Free Estimate”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 2 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
33 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pestban.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 28 issues on pestban.com, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.