Website review, no card needed

pgf.com.pl logo

pgf.com.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202632 issues · 80 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on pgf.com.pl, 11 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 312.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Oct 31, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
123 ms100 msMay 16Oct 31107 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026118 ms
Jun 6, 2026117 ms
Jun 13, 2026117 ms
Jun 20, 2026118 ms
Jun 27, 2026117 ms
Jul 4, 2026113 ms
Jul 11, 2026116 ms
Jul 18, 2026113 ms
Jul 25, 2026112 ms
Aug 1, 2026111 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026108 ms
Aug 22, 2026110 ms
Aug 29, 2026109 ms
Sep 5, 2026114 ms
Sep 12, 2026120 ms
Sep 19, 2026115 ms
Sep 26, 2026113 ms
Oct 3, 2026110 ms
Oct 10, 2026108 ms
Oct 17, 2026107 ms
Oct 24, 2026107 ms
Oct 31, 2026107 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pgf.com.pl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pgf.com.pl at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. pgf.com.pl at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. pgf.com.pl at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. pgf.com.pl at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. pgf.com.pl at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. pgf.com.pl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. pgf.com.pl at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. pgf.com.pl at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

4 to fix91
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    23 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 6.1 MB

    78 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.1 MB).

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 121 ms

    121 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 121 ms of main-thread work and 295 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    228 KiB

    About 228 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and Google Analytics), adding 358 KiB and 122 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    95 KiB

    1 image could be 95 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 84 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    22 KiB

    About 22 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 91

    91/100

    Your mobile performance score is 91. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 434 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 384 ms

    384 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 384 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Your largest element takes 2.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Razem dla Pacjenta”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.2 s).

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 107 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 112 ms

    112 ms

    Real visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 17 ms

    17 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 17 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 6.5 MB in 88 requests

    6.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 88 requests on a phone: media 3.3 MB (1), images 2.3 MB (33) and scripts 540 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images below the first screen load straight away

    15 images further down the page (2.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (918 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.84 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.84 g of CO₂e: 220.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8692
  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 24 images without alt text

    24 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8576
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (3 characters)

    Your title is only 3 characters: “PGF”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 44 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 44 pages on pgf.com.pl and 21 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Razem dla Pacjenta”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pgf.com.pl/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pgf.com.pl/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,100 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /wspolpracuj-z-nami, /dla-inwestorow, /innowacje, /dolacz-do-pgf, /kultura-organizacyjna and /odpowiedzialnosc-spoleczna and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /wspolpracuj-z-nami, /dla-inwestorow, /innowacje, /dolacz-do-pgf, /kultura-organizacyjna and /odpowiedzialnosc-spoleczna and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /dolacz-do-pgf took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9674
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://pgf-test.pgf.com.pl/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/nowe-logo-recepta-pl.jpg.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 854 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 854 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pgf.com.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2022.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Pgf As Pelion S.A.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on pgf.com.pl, including 11 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25