Website review, no card needed

pgaresort.com logo

pgaresort.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202635 issues · 88 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on pgaresort.com, 10 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: audioeye-services.com adds 2.5 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.9 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 243.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20264.1 s
Sep 26, 20264.3 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
282 ms133 msMay 9Oct 24184 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026180 ms
May 16, 2026187 ms
May 23, 2026187 ms
May 30, 2026186 ms
Jun 6, 2026185 ms
Jun 13, 2026185 ms
Jun 20, 2026185 ms
Jun 27, 2026187 ms
Jul 4, 2026187 ms
Jul 11, 2026181 ms
Jul 18, 2026180 ms
Jul 25, 2026180 ms
Aug 1, 2026195 ms
Aug 8, 2026213 ms
Aug 15, 2026218 ms
Aug 22, 2026219 ms
Aug 29, 2026187 ms
Sep 5, 2026150 ms
Sep 12, 2026167 ms
Sep 19, 2026213 ms
Sep 26, 2026237 ms
Oct 3, 2026265 ms
Oct 10, 2026236 ms
Oct 17, 2026187 ms
Oct 24, 2026184 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pgaresort.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pgaresort.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. pgaresort.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. pgaresort.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. pgaresort.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. pgaresort.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  6. pgaresort.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  7. pgaresort.com at 5.8 s5.8 s
  8. pgaresort.com at 6.6 s6.6 s

Speed

13 to fix43
  • audioeye-services.com adds 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    audioeye-services.com costs a phone 2.5 s of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 11.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (audioeye-services.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.0 MB and 4.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 1.1 MB

    105 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    990 ms · 914 KiB

    About 914 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 990 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 MB

    20 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 872 ms

    872 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 872 ms of main-thread work and 961 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • Minify JavaScript

    390 ms · 48 KiB

    48 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 386 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 257 ms

    257 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 257 ms of main-thread work and 278 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,845 HTML elements

    The page has 1,845 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    240 ms · 61 KiB

    About 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 240 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 239 ms

    239 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 239 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Your largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.7 s

    25.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 55% slower for real visitors

    +55%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 180 ms to 184 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 112 ms

    112 ms

    Real visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 747 ms

    747 ms

    Real visitors wait 747 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013

    0.013

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix33
  • Page weight: 7.2 MB in 202 requests

    7.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.2 MB in 202 requests on a phone: images 4.4 MB (61), scripts 2.4 MB (56) and fonts 218 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    1.2 MB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example DSC09338.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.2 MB.

  • 36 images below the first screen load straight away

    36 images further down the page (3.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 27 images in older formats

    27 images (2.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.03 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.03 g of CO₂e: 244.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9496
  • 86 form fields without a label

    86 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

    button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 83 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 2 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10097
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 130 internal links, 29 external

    The homepage links to 130 pages on pgaresort.com and 29 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Discover luxury at PGA National Resort in Palm Beach, Florida. Enjoy transformed guest rooms, championship golf, fine d…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Boldly Reinvented,Unmistakably Legendary”.

  • Title: 58 characters

    Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Luxury Golf Resort in Palm Beach, FL | PGA National Resort”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.pgaresort.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Resort, VideoObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.pgaresort.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.pgaresort.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,315 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    https://www.pgaresort.com/welcome and https://www.pgaresort.com/welcome/take-a-tour all use the title “Take a Tour Photo Gallery | Welcome | PGA National Resort”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.pgaresort.com/welcome and https://www.pgaresort.com/welcome/take-a-tour use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.pgaresort.com/welcome, whose canonical is https://www.pgaresort.com/welcome/take-a-tour. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.pgaresort.com/golf/cognizant-classic has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 88 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 23 small tap targets

    23 of 91 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix88
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,440 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,440 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK” and “Request for Proposal”.

  • 23 calls to action

    The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “BOOK”, “Book a Room” and “Join Us for Dinner”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 36 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pgaresort.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on pgaresort.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25