Website review, no card needed

pnu.edu.sa logo

pnu.edu.sa website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202646 issues · 86 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on pnu.edu.sa, 11 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: font display. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.6 sMay 2Oct 173.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.8 s
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
135 ms93 msMay 2Oct 17122 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026108 ms
May 9, 2026102 ms
May 16, 2026103 ms
May 23, 2026102 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026102 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 202698 ms
Jul 4, 2026100 ms
Jul 11, 2026101 ms
Jul 18, 2026106 ms
Jul 25, 2026113 ms
Aug 1, 2026114 ms
Aug 8, 2026120 ms
Aug 15, 2026117 ms
Aug 22, 2026114 ms
Aug 29, 2026117 ms
Sep 5, 2026116 ms
Sep 12, 2026120 ms
Sep 19, 2026126 ms
Sep 26, 2026129 ms
Oct 3, 2026130 ms
Oct 10, 2026128 ms
Oct 17, 2026122 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pnu.edu.sa (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pnu.edu.sa at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. pnu.edu.sa at 3.0 s3.0 s
  3. pnu.edu.sa at 4.5 s4.5 s
  4. pnu.edu.sa at 6.0 s6.0 s
  5. pnu.edu.sa at 7.5 s7.5 s
  6. pnu.edu.sa at 9.0 s9.0 s
  7. pnu.edu.sa at 10.5 s10.5 s
  8. pnu.edu.sa at 12.0 s12.0 s

Speed

13 to fix63
  • Font display

    1.8 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.8 s).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    700 ms · 721 KiB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (721 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63 (desktop: 84). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    610 ms · 125 KiB

    About 125 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 114 KiB

    About 114 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 323 KiB

    2 images could be 323 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    501 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 501 ms on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    500 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 500 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 793 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,619 HTML elements

    The page has 1,619 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Server response: 601 ms

    601 ms

    Your server takes 601 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 125 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, muneer.cx and Google Fonts), adding 51 KiB and 103 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Your largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “الخدمات الرقمية في جامعة الأميرة نورة”. Most of its time is resource load delay (4.8 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 122 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 147 ms

    147 ms

    Real visitors wait 147 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 166 ms

    166 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 166 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025

    0.025

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix93
  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (357 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (357 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.56 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.56 g of CO₂e: 67.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 2.0 MB in 45 requests

    2.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 45 requests on a phone: fonts 951 KiB (10), images 601 KiB (14) and scripts 226 KiB (10). That is a lean page.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 9190
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 8 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9284
  • Title is short (15 characters)

    Your title is only 15 characters: “الصفحة الرئيسية”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 152 internal links, 43 external

    The homepage links to 152 pages on pnu.edu.sa and 43 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 101 characters

    Your meta description is 101 characters: “صفحة الصفحة الرئيسية ضمن خدمات ومعلومات الرئيسية بالبوابة الرسمية لجامعة الأميرة نورة بنت عبد الرحمن.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “جامعة الأميرة نورة بنت عبد الرحمن - الموقع الرسمي”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/Pages/Home.aspx.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pnu.edu.sa/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://pnu.edu.sa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/Pages/Home.aspx and https://pnu.edu.sa/ar all use the title “الصفحة الرئيسية”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://pnu.edu.sa/ar, whose canonical is https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/Pages/Home.aspx. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 12 pages with very little text

    https://pnu.edu.sa/ar, https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/AboutUniversity/Pages/AboutLinks.aspx, https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/AboutUniversity/Pages/UniversityCouncil1.aspx, https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/AboutUniversity/Pages/OrganizationStructure1.aspx, https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/AboutUniversity/Pages/PNUinNumbers.aspx and https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/AboutUniversity/Pages/PresidentMessage.aspx and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/Centers/Pages/AllCenters.aspx, https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/MediaCenter/Pages/About.aspx and https://pnu.edu.sa/ar/MediaCenter/Pages/Mediafiles.aspx took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 26 small tap targets

    26 of 67 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Muneer: not loading because the subscription for this widget is not active. Contact Muneer support to resolve it.”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 39 words

    The homepage has only about 39 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pnu.edu.sa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity

Company

Founded
1970

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on pnu.edu.sa, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25