Website review, no card needed

porocel.com logo

porocel.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202632 issues · 75 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on porocel.com, 13 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s1.6 sMay 2Oct 173.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.2 s
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
395 ms75 msMay 2Oct 17346 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026161 ms
May 9, 2026153 ms
May 16, 2026142 ms
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026117 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 13, 2026113 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026115 ms
Jul 11, 2026119 ms
Jul 18, 2026122 ms
Jul 25, 2026126 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026135 ms
Aug 22, 2026136 ms
Aug 29, 2026137 ms
Sep 5, 2026163 ms
Sep 12, 2026231 ms
Sep 19, 2026289 ms
Sep 26, 2026325 ms
Oct 3, 2026348 ms
Oct 10, 2026358 ms
Oct 17, 2026346 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of porocel.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. porocel.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. porocel.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. porocel.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. porocel.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. porocel.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. porocel.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. porocel.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  8. porocel.com at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

7 to fix61
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.3 s · 568 KiB

    29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (568 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 516 KiB

    About 516 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 61

    61/100

    Your mobile performance score is 61 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 106 KiB

    1 image could be 106 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 51 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 51 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,785 HTML elements

    The page has 1,785 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, Facebook and Adobe Tag Manager and others), adding 890 KiB and 418 ms of main-thread time.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 118 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 91 but mobile only 61. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify JavaScript

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 894 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    Your largest element takes 9.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “2023_Canoe_Difference_4to3_full_RGB”.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 331 ms

    331 ms

    Real visitors wait 331 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 124% slower for real visitors

    +124%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 161 ms to 346 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 100 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (57 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.44 g of CO₂e: 52.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.5 MB in 70 requests

    1.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 70 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (40), images 211 KiB (10) and fonts 198 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10098
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9282
  • Title is short (9 characters)

    Your title is only 9 characters: “Catalysts”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (215 characters)

    Your meta description is 215 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Invalid hreflang

    Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 210 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 210 pages on porocel.com and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Catalysts”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.evonik.com/en/company/businesslines/ka.html.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.evonik.com/en.sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix70
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Parts of the site are closed to 4 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

2 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,080 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.evonik.com/llms.txt (20 KiB, 51 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 3 pages share a title

    https://www.evonik.com/en/company/businesslines/ka.html, https://www.evonik.com/de/unternehmen/businesslines/ka.html and https://www.evonik.com/en/markets/market_1345320.html all use the title “Catalysts”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.evonik.com/de/unternehmen/businesslines/ka.html, whose canonical is https://www.evonik.com/en/company/businesslines/ka.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 195 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'appendChild')”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,286 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,286 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Register”, “Download” and “Sample Order”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at porocel.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on porocel.com, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25