Website review, no card needed

prepinsta.com logo

prepinsta.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202653 issues · 99 checks

This review found 53 issues worth fixing on prepinsta.com, 23 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.1 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.6 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
309 ms221 msMay 9Oct 24299 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026234 ms
May 16, 2026234 ms
May 23, 2026233 ms
May 30, 2026234 ms
Jun 6, 2026238 ms
Jun 13, 2026241 ms
Jun 20, 2026240 ms
Jun 27, 2026235 ms
Jul 4, 2026231 ms
Jul 11, 2026233 ms
Jul 18, 2026237 ms
Jul 25, 2026244 ms
Aug 1, 2026249 ms
Aug 8, 2026259 ms
Aug 15, 2026273 ms
Aug 22, 2026284 ms
Aug 29, 2026294 ms
Sep 5, 2026295 ms
Sep 12, 2026289 ms
Sep 19, 2026283 ms
Sep 26, 2026275 ms
Oct 3, 2026280 ms
Oct 10, 2026281 ms
Oct 17, 2026288 ms
Oct 24, 2026299 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of prepinsta.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. prepinsta.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. prepinsta.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. prepinsta.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. prepinsta.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. prepinsta.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  6. prepinsta.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  7. prepinsta.com at 7.3 s7.3 s
  8. prepinsta.com at 8.3 s8.3 s

Speed

14 to fix19
  • Improve image delivery

    2.4 s · 2.6 MB

    55 images could be 2.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    39 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 769 KiB

    About 769 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 19

    19/100

    Your mobile performance score is 19. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    800 ms · 14.2 MB

    187 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14.2 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Freshchat and Facebook and others), adding 2.2 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 155 KiB

    About 155 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Freshchat adds 693 ms

    693 ms

    Freshchat costs a phone 693 ms of main-thread work and 986 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 701 ms

    701 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 701 ms of main-thread work and 583 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 335 ms

    335 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 335 ms of main-thread work and 254 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 280 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,143 HTML elements

    The page has 2,143 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    27 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.30

    0.30

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.30 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 37.9 s

    37.9 s

    Your largest element takes 37.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “prepinsta”.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.0 s

    40.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.4 s

    9.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.369

    0.369

    The layout shifts by 0.369 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 301 ms

    301 ms

    Real visitors wait 301 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors

    +25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 234 ms to 299 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 848 ms

    848 ms

    Real visitors wait 848 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 26 images without width and height

    26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 20.8 MB in 414 requests

    20.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 20.8 MB in 414 requests on a phone: images 9.3 MB (290), media 8.9 MB (2) and scripts 2.0 MB (54). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 2.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    1,004 KiB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example homepage-compressed-image.webp at 2,816 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1,004 KiB.

  • 15 images below the first screen load straight away

    15 images further down the page (1.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (801 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 5.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.89 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.89 g of CO₂e: 706.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 7483
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 24 text elements with low contrast

    24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 14 tap targets too small

    14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (3 elements)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 form fields without a label

    13 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (12 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 11 failed. 7 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8590
  • Meta description is short (2 characters)

    Your meta description is only 2 characters: “42”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 10 links crawlers can't follow

    10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 210 internal links, 55 external

    The homepage links to 210 pages on prepinsta.com and 55 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “PrepInsta, Upskilling Simplified!!!”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “PrepInsta : Prepare for Placements Instantly”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://prepinsta.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://prepinsta.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,465 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 10 pages slow to respond

    /all-companies-dashboard, /amcat, /cocubes, /first-naukri, /hackerrank and /hirepro and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 139 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 4281
  • 17 small tap targets

    17 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • 4 distorted images

    4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Requests the notification permission on page load

    Requests the notification permission on page load.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 977 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 977 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up for Free”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Sign Up for Free”, “Get Started” and “Download Now”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 8 trust badges and “Over 475 companies”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 21 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at prepinsta.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
CloudFront

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 53 issues on prepinsta.com, including 27 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25