Website review, no card needed
prideinnhotels.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202623 issues · 77 checks
This review found 23 issues worth fixing on prideinnhotels.com, 8 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 186 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
228 KiB7 images could be 228 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
19 KiBAbout 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 94
94/100Your mobile performance score is 94. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.4 s
A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 16 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 87 ms
87 msYour server sent the HTML in 87 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.5 s
5.5 sReal visitors wait 5.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.7 s
3.7 sReal visitors wait 3.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 37% slower for real visitors
+37%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 186 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sYour largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PrideInn Paradise is one of the best hotels in Mombasa, off…”.
8 checks passed
Real-user INP: 171 ms
171 msReal visitors wait 171 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors
-24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.8 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe page is fully interactive after 3.0 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Speed Index: 2.5 s
2.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.5 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.021
0.021The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.021, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.1 MB in 33 requests
4.1 MBYour homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 33 requests on a phone: images 3.9 MB (26), fonts 116 KiB (5) and HTML 46 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.15 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.15 g of CO₂e: 138.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
8 tap targets too small
8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (72 characters)
Your title is 72 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Hotels in Nairobi | Hotels in Mombasa - PrideInn Hotels, Resorts & Camps”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“PrideInn Hotels, Resorts & Camps” and “World-class Amenities”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
58 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 58 pages on prideinnhotels.com and 9 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 152 characters
Your meta description is 152 characters: “PrideInn Hotels, Resorts & Camps, the best hotels in Kenya. Discover unparalleled hospitality and accommodations across…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.prideinnhotels.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, Hotel and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.prideinnhotels.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (676 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.prideinnhotels.com/llms.txt (46 KiB, 199 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without an H1
https://www.prideinnhotels.com/contact-us, https://www.prideinnhotels.com/our-magazine and https://www.prideinnhotels.com/blog have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.prideinnhotels.com/conferencing, https://www.prideinnhotels.com/weddings and https://www.prideinnhotels.com/contact-us took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
23 of 24 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 581 words of copy
The homepage carries about 581 words of visible text.
8 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK NOW” and “CALL NOW”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “BOOK NOW” and “BOOK DIRECTLY”.
1 short form
A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at prideinnhotels.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Newfold Digital
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 23 issues on prideinnhotels.com, including 6 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.