Website review, no card needed

pride.md logo

pride.md website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202635 issues · 88 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on pride.md, 8 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.1 sMay 23Nov 71.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Nov 7, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
142 ms77 msMay 23Nov 798 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026104 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 202694 ms
Jun 13, 2026102 ms
Jun 20, 202695 ms
Jun 27, 202698 ms
Jul 4, 2026101 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202684 ms
Aug 8, 202686 ms
Aug 15, 202687 ms
Aug 22, 202687 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202696 ms
Sep 12, 2026116 ms
Sep 19, 2026134 ms
Sep 26, 2026134 ms
Oct 3, 2026133 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 202691 ms
Oct 24, 202695 ms
Oct 31, 202691 ms
Nov 7, 202698 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pride.md (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pride.md at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. pride.md at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. pride.md at 3.8 s3.8 s
  4. pride.md at 5.1 s5.1 s
  5. pride.md at 6.3 s6.3 s
  6. pride.md at 7.6 s7.6 s
  7. pride.md at 8.9 s8.9 s
  8. pride.md at 10.2 s10.2 s

Speed

12 to fix67
  • Main-thread work: 4.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    400 ms · 2.7 MB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.7 MB).

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, yeastar.com and Google Analytics and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 848 ms

    848 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 848 ms of main-thread work and 797 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    865 KiB

    About 865 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Render-blocking requests

    850 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.

  • yeastar.com adds 644 ms

    644 ms

    yeastar.com costs a phone 644 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    600 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    547 KiB

    7 images could be 547 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 496 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1,993 HTML elements

    The page has 1,993 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 152 KiB

    About 152 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 145 ms

    145 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 145 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 914 ms

    914 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 914 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 32% slower for real visitors

    +32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 946 ms

    946 ms

    Real visitors wait 946 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 98 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 98 ms

    98 ms

    Real visitors wait 98 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.088

    0.088

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.088, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the image “CSB Battery – reliable power for UPS systems”.

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 72 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 72 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (16), images 819 KiB (29) and fonts 386 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    hp-products2_678x452-500x355.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (395 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.02 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.02 g of CO₂e: 122.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 102 text elements with low contrast

    102 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (159 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 159 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 16 form fields without a label

    16 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (12 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (17 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 142 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9272
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (85 characters)

    Your title is 85 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “PRIDE.MD - Your partner for delivering technological solutions from leading suppliers”.

  • Meta description is long (276 characters)

    Your meta description is 276 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.pride.md/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 155 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 155 pages on pride.md and 5 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.pride.md/en.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: LocalBusiness.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.pride.md/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,432 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.pride.md/en-compare-products, https://www.pride.md/en-wishlist, https://www.pride.md/about-us, https://www.pride.md/how-do-you-buy, https://www.pride.md/contact-us and https://www.pride.md/service-center and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    74 of 81 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,404 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,404 words of visible text.

9 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Buy”.

  • 21 calls to action

    The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “How to buy?”, “Contact Us” and “Buy”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 41 testimonial or review blocks and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pride.md, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Pride System SRL

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on pride.md, including 19 speed issues and 5 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25