Website review, no card needed
propanraya.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202638 issues · 85 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on propanraya.com, 17 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #65,713 of 88,976 reviewed websitesbeats 23%
- #37,936 of 46,343 online storesbeats 15%
- #1,316 of 2,164 WooCommerce storesbeats 34%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 143 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 128 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.0 s
3.0 s
4.0 s
5.0 s
6.0 s
6.9 s
7.9 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.3 s · 638 KiB85 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (638 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s54 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 225 KiBAbout 225 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 657 KiB15 images could be 657 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, WordPress and Hotjar and others), adding 3.1 MB and 338 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 131 KiBAbout 131 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
WordPress adds 120 ms
120 msWordPress costs a phone 120 ms of main-thread work and 2.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,526 HTML elements
The page has 2,526 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 105 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 249 ms
249 msYour server sent the HTML in 249 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.6 s
13.6 sYour largest element takes 13.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (6.7 s).
Speed Index: 14.0 s
14.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 13.8 s
13.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 97% slower for real visitors
+97%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 228 ms
228 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 228 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 163 ms
163 msReal visitors wait 163 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 143 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.2 MB in 165 requests
4.2 MBYour homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 165 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (43), scripts 702 KiB (59) and fonts 514 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.19 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.19 g of CO₂e: 142.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (12 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
18 links without text
18 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 68 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (20 characters)
Your title is only 20 characters: “Propan - Cat Terbaik”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (177 characters)
Your meta description is 177 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
229 internal links, 21 external
The homepage links to 229 pages on propanraya.com and 21 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.propanraya.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.propanraya.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/pilihan-cat-besi has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
/pilihan-cat-besi has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 pages slow to respond
/kategori/cat-tembok/cat-tembok-eksterior, /kategori/cat-tembok/cat-tembok-interior, /kategori/cat-tembok/cat-tembok-heritage, /kategori/cat-anti-bocor, /pilihan-cat-besi and /kategori/cat-lantai and 9 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 35 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 66 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 136 words
The homepage has only about 136 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
5 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Sales”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Hotjar and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at propanraya.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Vue.js
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Hotjar
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on propanraya.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.