Website review, no card needed
propartes.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202636 issues · 80 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on propartes.com, 18 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 115 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 134 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
5.8 s98 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.7 s · 758 KiBAbout 758 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 348 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (348 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.2 MB and 520 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 226 ms
226 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 226 ms of main-thread work and 432 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,218 HTML elements
The page has 2,218 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google Maps adds 149 ms
149 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 149 ms of main-thread work and 380 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 241 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
86 KiB1 image could be 86 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors wait 4.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s
8.5 sYour largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “aceite para carro”.
First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sThe first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 12.6 s
12.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.6 s
7.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 266 ms
266 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 266 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 134 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 155 ms
155 msReal visitors wait 155 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.8 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.3 MB in 141 requests
2.3 MBYour homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 141 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (65), images 433 KiB (13) and fonts 130 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
70 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example BANNER-LM.webp at 2,001 px wide, shown at 391 px. Resized copies would save about 70 KiB.
4 images in older formats
4 images (215 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.64 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.64 g of CO₂e: 76.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
32 tap targets too small
32 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (2 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
22 links without text
22 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h3 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is long (209 characters)
Your meta description is 209 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
175 internal links, 55 external
The homepage links to 175 pages on propartes.com and 55 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “PROPARTES S.A.S. – Promotora Internacional de Partes”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://propartes.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.propartes.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://propartes.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (703 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without an H1
https://propartes.com/acerca-de-nosotros has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v4.7.0/css/font-awesome-css.min.css' from origin 'htt…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 251 words of copy
The homepage carries about 251 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at propartes.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on propartes.com, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.