Website review, no card needed
propelius.tech website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202637 issues · 83 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on propelius.tech, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 33.7 MB in 124 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 429 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 504 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 410 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 388 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 361 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 362 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 384 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 384 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 417 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 429 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 407 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 398 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 429 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 444 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 372 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 356 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 382 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 421 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 426 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 431 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.5 s
3.0 s
4.5 s
5.9 s
7.4 s
8.9 s
10.4 s
11.9 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.7 s · 576 KiBAbout 576 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 16.3 s
A phone's processor spends 16.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
400 ms · 23.0 MB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (23.0 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 23.6 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.
Amazon Web Services adds 16 ms
16 msAmazon Web Services costs a phone 16 ms of main-thread work and 22.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
Improve image delivery
400 ms · 36 KiB1 image could be 36 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 413 ms
413 msFacebook costs a phone 413 ms of main-thread work and 229 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 379 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 62 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 169 ms
169 msYour server sent the HTML in 169 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 8.3 s
8.3 sThe first text or image appears after 8.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 38.7 s
38.7 sYour largest element takes 38.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “An AI-powered product team for founders who ship — MVPs sta…”.
Time to Interactive: 41.0 s
41.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.6 s
12.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.7 s
3.7 sReal visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 384 ms
384 msReal visitors wait 384 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 429 ms to 431 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 686 ms
686 msReal visitors wait 686 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 33.7 MB in 124 requests
33.7 MBYour homepage downloads 33.7 MB in 124 requests on a phone: images 22.9 MB (34), media 6.5 MB (1) and HTML 1.4 MB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 9.5 g of CO₂ per visit
9.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.54 g of CO₂e: 1145.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 88 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
27 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 27 pages on propelius.tech and 7 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 126 characters
Your meta description is 126 characters: “Explore mobile and web app development, MVP development, AI automation, UI/UX design, and dedicated developers with Pro…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “You bring the vision.We engineer it into a product.”.
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Software & AI Development Services | Propelius”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://propelius.tech/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: OfferCatalog, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://propelius.tech/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,320 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://propelius.tech/llms.txt (4 KiB, 19 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without a title
https://propelius.tech/privacy-policy, https://propelius.tech/refund-policy and https://propelius.tech/terms-and-conditions have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
3 pages without a meta description
https://propelius.tech/privacy-policy, https://propelius.tech/refund-policy and https://propelius.tech/terms-and-conditions have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://propelius.tech/portfolio, https://propelius.tech/blogs and https://propelius.tech/ai-automation have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
11 internal pages checked
We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 11 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 1,404 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,404 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Contact via WhatsApp”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Get a Quote Now” and “Contact via WhatsApp”.
1 short form
A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo, a star rating and 1 trust badge.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at propelius.tech, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on propelius.tech, including 20 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.