Website review, no card needed

propelius.tech logo

propelius.tech website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on propelius.tech, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 33.7 MB in 124 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s3.2 sMay 23Nov 73.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.7 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.3 s
Aug 8, 20264.2 s
Aug 15, 20264.2 s
Aug 22, 20264.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.8 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Oct 24, 20263.7 s
Oct 31, 20263.7 s
Nov 7, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
526 ms334 msMay 23Nov 7431 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026429 ms
May 30, 2026504 ms
Jun 6, 2026410 ms
Jun 13, 2026388 ms
Jun 20, 2026361 ms
Jun 27, 2026362 ms
Jul 4, 2026384 ms
Jul 11, 2026384 ms
Jul 18, 2026417 ms
Jul 25, 2026429 ms
Aug 1, 2026407 ms
Aug 8, 2026398 ms
Aug 15, 2026429 ms
Aug 22, 2026404 ms
Aug 29, 2026404 ms
Sep 5, 2026444 ms
Sep 12, 2026375 ms
Sep 19, 2026375 ms
Sep 26, 2026372 ms
Oct 3, 2026356 ms
Oct 10, 2026387 ms
Oct 17, 2026382 ms
Oct 24, 2026421 ms
Oct 31, 2026426 ms
Nov 7, 2026431 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of propelius.tech (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. propelius.tech at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. propelius.tech at 3.0 s3.0 s
  3. propelius.tech at 4.5 s4.5 s
  4. propelius.tech at 5.9 s5.9 s
  5. propelius.tech at 7.4 s7.4 s
  6. propelius.tech at 8.9 s8.9 s
  7. propelius.tech at 10.4 s10.4 s
  8. propelius.tech at 11.9 s11.9 s

Speed

11 to fix30
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.7 s · 576 KiB

    About 576 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 16.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 16.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 30

    30/100

    Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    400 ms · 23.0 MB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (23.0 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 23.6 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 16 ms

    16 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 16 ms of main-thread work and 22.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 36 KiB

    1 image could be 36 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 413 ms

    413 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 413 ms of main-thread work and 229 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 379 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 62 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 169 ms

    169 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 169 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 38.7 s

    38.7 s

    Your largest element takes 38.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “An AI-powered product team for founders who ship — MVPs sta…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 41.0 s

    41.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 41.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.6 s

    12.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 384 ms

    384 ms

    Real visitors wait 384 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 429 ms to 431 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 686 ms

    686 ms

    Real visitors wait 686 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 33.7 MB in 124 requests

    33.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 33.7 MB in 124 requests on a phone: images 22.9 MB (34), media 6.5 MB (1) and HTML 1.4 MB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 9.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    9.54 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.54 g of CO₂e: 1145.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8791
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 88 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 27 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 27 pages on propelius.tech and 7 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 126 characters

    Your meta description is 126 characters: “Explore mobile and web app development, MVP development, AI automation, UI/UX design, and dedicated developers with Pro…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “You bring the vision.We engineer it into a product.”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Software & AI Development Services | Propelius”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://propelius.tech/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: OfferCatalog, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://propelius.tech/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,320 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://propelius.tech/llms.txt (4 KiB, 19 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 3 pages without a title

    https://propelius.tech/privacy-policy, https://propelius.tech/refund-policy and https://propelius.tech/terms-and-conditions have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://propelius.tech/privacy-policy, https://propelius.tech/refund-policy and https://propelius.tech/terms-and-conditions have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://propelius.tech/portfolio, https://propelius.tech/blogs and https://propelius.tech/ai-automation have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 11 internal pages checked

    We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 11 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fix91
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    12 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 1,404 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,404 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Contact via WhatsApp”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Get a Quote Now” and “Contact via WhatsApp”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo, a star rating and 1 trust badge.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 26 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at propelius.tech, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on propelius.tech, including 20 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25