Website review, no card needed
qdq.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202633 issues · 84 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on qdq.com, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 194 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 139 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 565 KiBAbout 565 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 80). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.3 s
A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cdn-website.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
500 ms · 110 KiB1 image could be 110 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 533 ms
533 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 533 ms of main-thread work and 407 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 357 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (357 KiB).
cdn-website.com adds 299 ms
299 mscdn-website.com costs a phone 299 ms of main-thread work and 816 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,620 HTML elements
The page has 2,620 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
multiscreensite.com adds 11 ms
11 msmultiscreensite.com costs a phone 11 ms of main-thread work and 359 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 217 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 17 KiBAbout 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Duplicated JavaScript
15 KiB15 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 80 but mobile only 45. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 162 ms
162 msYour server sent the HTML in 162 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sYour largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Donde los clientes y profesionales encuentran negocios en E…”.
Time to Interactive: 15.0 s
15.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 763 ms
763 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 763 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.17
0.17The layout shifts by 0.17 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.6 s
4.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 170 ms
170 msReal visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 406 ms
406 msReal visitors wait 406 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors
-24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.1 MB in 97 requests
2.1 MBYour homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 97 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (37), images 403 KiB (16) and fonts 152 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.60 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.60 g of CO₂e: 72.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
378 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 378 pages on qdq.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “El directorio de empresas donde empiezan las oportunidades”.
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Tu equipo de marketing digital | Grupo qdq”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.qdq.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.qdq.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,696 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.qdq.com/llms.txt (15 KiB, 129 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.qdq.com/inicio-delete all use the title “Tu equipo de marketing digital | Grupo qdq”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.qdq.com/marketing-digital and https://www.qdq.com/marketing-digital/planes-digitales/plan-desarrollo have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 129 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.qdq.com/.
64 small tap targets
64 of 74 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “handleImageLoadError is not defined”.
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Requests the geolocation permission on page load.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 904 words of copy
The homepage carries about 904 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qdq.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on qdq.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.