Website review, no card needed

qdq.com logo

qdq.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202633 issues · 84 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on qdq.com, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s3.3 sMay 9Oct 243.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.5 s
May 16, 20263.6 s
May 23, 20263.6 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.6 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.5 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
229 ms122 msMay 9Oct 24139 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026178 ms
May 16, 2026187 ms
May 23, 2026194 ms
May 30, 2026204 ms
Jun 6, 2026202 ms
Jun 13, 2026194 ms
Jun 20, 2026188 ms
Jun 27, 2026180 ms
Jul 4, 2026178 ms
Jul 11, 2026186 ms
Jul 18, 2026198 ms
Jul 25, 2026210 ms
Aug 1, 2026217 ms
Aug 8, 2026198 ms
Aug 15, 2026171 ms
Aug 22, 2026150 ms
Aug 29, 2026134 ms
Sep 5, 2026136 ms
Sep 12, 2026140 ms
Sep 19, 2026141 ms
Sep 26, 2026141 ms
Oct 3, 2026140 ms
Oct 10, 2026139 ms
Oct 17, 2026139 ms
Oct 24, 2026139 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of qdq.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. qdq.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. qdq.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. qdq.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. qdq.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. qdq.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. qdq.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. qdq.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  8. qdq.com at 3.4 s3.4 s

Speed

10 to fix45
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 565 KiB

    About 565 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 80). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cdn-website.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    500 ms · 110 KiB

    1 image could be 110 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 533 ms

    533 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 533 ms of main-thread work and 407 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 357 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (357 KiB).

  • cdn-website.com adds 299 ms

    299 ms

    cdn-website.com costs a phone 299 ms of main-thread work and 816 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,620 HTML elements

    The page has 2,620 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • multiscreensite.com adds 11 ms

    11 ms

    multiscreensite.com costs a phone 11 ms of main-thread work and 359 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 217 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 17 KiB

    About 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    15 KiB

    15 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 80 but mobile only 45. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 162 ms

    162 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 162 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Your largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Donde los clientes y profesionales encuentran negocios en E…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.0 s

    15.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 763 ms

    763 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 763 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.17

    0.17

    The layout shifts by 0.17 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 170 ms

    170 ms

    Real visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 406 ms

    406 ms

    Real visitors wait 406 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 97 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 97 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (37), images 403 KiB (16) and fonts 152 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.60 g of CO₂e: 72.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9290
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 378 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 378 pages on qdq.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “El directorio de empresas donde empiezan las oportunidades”.

  • Title: 42 characters

    Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Tu equipo de marketing digital | Grupo qdq”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.qdq.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.qdq.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,696 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.qdq.com/llms.txt (15 KiB, 129 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.qdq.com/inicio-delete all use the title “Tu equipo de marketing digital | Grupo qdq”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.qdq.com/marketing-digital and https://www.qdq.com/marketing-digital/planes-digitales/plan-desarrollo have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 129 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9271
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.qdq.com/.

  • 64 small tap targets

    64 of 74 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “handleImageLoadError is not defined”.

  • Requests the geolocation permission on page load

    Requests the geolocation permission on page load.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 904 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 904 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qdq.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Google Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on qdq.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25