Website review, no card needed

qi.iq logo

qi.iq website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202643 issues · 89 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on qi.iq, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.1 s4.4 sMay 16Oct 314.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.8 s
May 23, 20265.0 s
May 30, 20265.0 s
Jun 6, 20264.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.9 s
Jun 20, 20264.8 s
Jun 27, 20264.8 s
Jul 4, 20264.7 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.6 s
Jul 25, 20264.6 s
Aug 1, 20264.6 s
Aug 8, 20264.5 s
Aug 15, 20264.6 s
Aug 22, 20264.6 s
Aug 29, 20264.6 s
Sep 5, 20264.6 s
Sep 12, 20264.6 s
Sep 19, 20264.6 s
Sep 26, 20264.5 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.5 s
Oct 17, 20264.5 s
Oct 24, 20264.7 s
Oct 31, 20264.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
109 ms99 msMay 16Oct 31106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026103 ms
May 23, 2026102 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026101 ms
Jun 13, 2026101 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 2026102 ms
Jul 4, 2026103 ms
Jul 11, 2026103 ms
Jul 18, 2026104 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026105 ms
Aug 29, 2026104 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026105 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 2026107 ms
Oct 3, 2026108 ms
Oct 10, 2026107 ms
Oct 17, 2026106 ms
Oct 24, 2026107 ms
Oct 31, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of qi.iq (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. qi.iq at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. qi.iq at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. qi.iq at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. qi.iq at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. qi.iq at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. qi.iq at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. qi.iq at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. qi.iq at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

10 to fix53
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    9.8 s · 1.8 MB

    About 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    11.5 s

    19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 11.5 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 2.1 MB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.1 MB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.3 s · 460 KiB

    About 460 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 MB

    11 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google CDN and others), adding 1.6 MB and 860 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 618 ms

    618 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 618 ms of main-thread work and 922 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 79 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 79 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 81 ms

    81 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 81 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 212 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 33 KiB

    33 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Document request latency

    40 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Minify CSS

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 106 ms

    106 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 106 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Real visitors wait 5.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 12.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 29.9 s

    29.9 s

    Your largest element takes 29.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “حلول دفع سهلة لحياة ذكية”.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.4 s

    30.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.1 s

    13.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.8 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 105 ms

    105 ms

    Real visitors wait 105 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 164 ms

    164 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 164 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 5.8 MB in 81 requests

    5.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 81 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (26), images 1.9 MB (29) and stylesheets 515 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    1.2 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 80fd8dfadc69ac058a7f6284d65a918b6f5423f7 (1) (1)_153632151_1 at 4,096 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 1.2 MB.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    80fd8dfadc69ac058a7f6284d65a918b6f5423f7 (1) (1)_153632151_1 weighs 595 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.65 g of CO₂e: 197.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8791
  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9274
  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “كي كارد | الرئيسية”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (162 characters)

    Your meta description is 162 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://qi.iq/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at qi.iq/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 50 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 50 pages on qi.iq and 6 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “QI”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is http://qi.iq/ar/home.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://qi.iq/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://qi.iq/ar/Qi-services and https://qi.iq/ar/merchants use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages with very little text

    https://qi.iq/ar/Cards, https://qi.iq/ar/travel-card, https://qi.iq/ar/card-ekhtiyari, https://qi.iq/ar/Qi-MasterCard-from-Rafidain-Bank, https://qi.iq/ar/visa-card and https://qi.iq/ar/card-company and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Only about 26 words

    The homepage has only about 26 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qi.iq, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
CloudFront

Company

Founded
2007
Headquarters
Baghdad

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on qi.iq, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25