Website review, no card needed
qi.iq website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202643 issues · 89 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on qi.iq, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 106 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
9.8 s · 1.8 MBAbout 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
11.5 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 11.5 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 2.1 MB24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.1 MB).
Reduce unused CSS
2.3 s · 460 KiBAbout 460 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
1.4 MB11 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google CDN and others), adding 1.6 MB and 860 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 618 ms
618 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 618 ms of main-thread work and 922 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 79 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 79 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 81 ms
81 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 81 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 212 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 33 KiB33 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Document request latency
40 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify CSS
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 106 ms
106 msYour server sent the HTML in 106 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.5 s
5.5 sReal visitors wait 5.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 12.9 s
12.9 sThe first text or image appears after 12.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 29.9 s
29.9 sYour largest element takes 29.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “حلول دفع سهلة لحياة ذكية”.
Time to Interactive: 30.4 s
30.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 30.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.1 s
13.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.8 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 105 ms
105 msReal visitors wait 105 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 164 ms
164 msScripts block the page for only 164 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.8 MB in 81 requests
5.8 MBYour homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 81 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (26), images 1.9 MB (29) and stylesheets 515 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images far larger than shown
1.2 MB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 80fd8dfadc69ac058a7f6284d65a918b6f5423f7 (1) (1)_153632151_1 at 4,096 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 1.2 MB.
1 image over 500 KB
80fd8dfadc69ac058a7f6284d65a918b6f5423f7 (1) (1)_153632151_1 weighs 595 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images in older formats
8 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.65 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.65 g of CO₂e: 197.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “كي كارد | الرئيسية”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (162 characters)
Your meta description is 162 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://qi.iq/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at qi.iq/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
50 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 50 pages on qi.iq and 6 external pages.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “QI”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is http://qi.iq/ar/home.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://qi.iq/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://qi.iq/ar/Qi-services and https://qi.iq/ar/merchants use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages with very little text
https://qi.iq/ar/Cards, https://qi.iq/ar/travel-card, https://qi.iq/ar/card-ekhtiyari, https://qi.iq/ar/Qi-MasterCard-from-Rafidain-Bank, https://qi.iq/ar/visa-card and https://qi.iq/ar/card-company and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Only about 26 words
The homepage has only about 26 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qi.iq, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Company
- Founded
- 2007
- Headquarters
- Baghdad
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on qi.iq, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.