Website review, no card needed
quill.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202635 issues · 79 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on quill.org, 16 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 117 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 361 KiBAbout 361 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 400 KiB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (400 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
1.3 s · 107 KiBAbout 107 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 971 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Segment and New Relic and others), adding 475 KiB and 687 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 538 ms
538 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 538 ms of main-thread work and 194 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
550 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 822 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
33 KiB33 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Duplicated JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s
11.8 sYour largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Quill.org, a non-profit, provides free literacy activities …”.
First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s
4.8 sThe first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 11.9 s
11.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.3 s
8.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 970 ms
970 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 970 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 155 ms
155 msReal visitors wait 155 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.8 MB in 64 requests
11.8 MBYour homepage downloads 11.8 MB in 64 requests on a phone: images 10.0 MB (13), scripts 744 KiB (29) and media 575 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.33 g of CO₂e: 400.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
20 text elements with low contrast
20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (44 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 44 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 115 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Free tools to make your students better writers a…”, “Quill Reading for Evidence” and “Quill in the Classroom”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
6 links with vague text
6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
120 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 120 pages on quill.org and 19 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 87 characters
Your meta description is 87 characters: “Quill provides free writing and grammar activities for middle and high school students.”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Quill.org | Interactive Writing and Grammar”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.quill.org/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.quill.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.quill.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,429 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages share a title
/, https://www.quill.org/science-of-reading-and-writing, https://www.quill.org/privacy-and-security, https://www.quill.org/activities/packs, https://www.quill.org/literature and https://www.quill.org/social-studies all use the title “Quill.org | Interactive Writing and Grammar”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
8 pages without a meta description
https://www.quill.org/admins, https://www.quill.org/science-of-reading-and-writing, https://www.quill.org/privacy-and-security, https://www.quill.org/research-and-efficacy, https://www.quill.org/premium and https://www.quill.org/activities/packs and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.quill.org/premium, https://www.quill.org/activities/packs, https://www.quill.org/literature and https://www.quill.org/social-studies have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 937 words of copy
The homepage carries about 937 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
19 calls to action
The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Contact Us Contact Sales or Support”, “Sign Up” and “Try a sample activity”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks and 7 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Segment and PostHog.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Segment (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quill.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Segment | PostHog
- Hosting
- Heroku
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on quill.org, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.