Website review, no card needed

quill.org logo

quill.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202635 issues · 79 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on quill.org, 16 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.1 sJun 13Aug 152.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
123 ms114 msJun 20Aug 15117 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 20, 2026115 ms
Jun 27, 2026118 ms
Jul 4, 2026120 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026121 ms
Jul 25, 2026118 ms
Aug 1, 2026120 ms
Aug 8, 2026115 ms
Aug 15, 2026117 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of quill.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. quill.org at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. quill.org at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. quill.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. quill.org at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. quill.org at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. quill.org at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. quill.org at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. quill.org at 4.1 s4.1 s

Speed

9 to fix36
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.7 s · 361 KiB

    About 361 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 400 KiB

    29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (400 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.3 s · 107 KiB

    About 107 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 971 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Segment and New Relic and others), adding 475 KiB and 687 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 538 ms

    538 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 538 ms of main-thread work and 194 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 822 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    33 KiB

    33 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    10 KiB

    10 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Your largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Quill.org, a non-profit, provides free literacy activities …”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.9 s

    11.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 970 ms

    970 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 970 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 155 ms

    155 ms

    Real visitors wait 155 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 11.8 MB in 64 requests

    11.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.8 MB in 64 requests on a phone: images 10.0 MB (13), scripts 744 KiB (29) and media 575 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.33 g of CO₂e: 400.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8591
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 20 text elements with low contrast

    20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (44 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 44 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 115 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9289
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Free tools to make your students better writers a…”, “Quill Reading for Evidence” and “Quill in the Classroom”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 120 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 120 pages on quill.org and 19 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 87 characters

    Your meta description is 87 characters: “Quill provides free writing and grammar activities for middle and high school students.”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Quill.org | Interactive Writing and Grammar”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.quill.org/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.quill.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.quill.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,429 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 6 pages share a title

    /, https://www.quill.org/science-of-reading-and-writing, https://www.quill.org/privacy-and-security, https://www.quill.org/activities/packs, https://www.quill.org/literature and https://www.quill.org/social-studies all use the title “Quill.org | Interactive Writing and Grammar”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.quill.org/admins, https://www.quill.org/science-of-reading-and-writing, https://www.quill.org/privacy-and-security, https://www.quill.org/research-and-efficacy, https://www.quill.org/premium and https://www.quill.org/activities/packs and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.quill.org/premium, https://www.quill.org/activities/packs, https://www.quill.org/literature and https://www.quill.org/social-studies have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 937 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 937 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Contact Us Contact Sales or Support”, “Sign Up” and “Try a sample activity”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks and 7 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Segment and PostHog.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Segment (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quill.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Segment | PostHog
Hosting
Heroku

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on quill.org, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25