Website review, no card needed

quontic.com logo

quontic.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202632 issues · 83 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on quontic.com, 8 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
138 ms109 msMay 16Oct 31133 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026117 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026135 ms
Jun 13, 2026131 ms
Jun 20, 2026133 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026127 ms
Jul 18, 2026129 ms
Jul 25, 2026133 ms
Aug 1, 2026132 ms
Aug 8, 2026125 ms
Aug 15, 2026118 ms
Aug 22, 2026112 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026117 ms
Sep 12, 2026122 ms
Sep 19, 2026125 ms
Sep 26, 2026125 ms
Oct 3, 2026121 ms
Oct 10, 2026119 ms
Oct 17, 2026121 ms
Oct 24, 2026131 ms
Oct 31, 2026133 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of quontic.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. quontic.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. quontic.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. quontic.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. quontic.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. quontic.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. quontic.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. quontic.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. quontic.com at 3.8 s3.8 s

Speed

11 to fix43
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.7 s · 1.8 MB

    About 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (nitrocdn.com, Google Tag Manager and Wistia and others), adding 11.1 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Wistia adds 483 ms

    483 ms

    Wistia costs a phone 483 ms of main-thread work and 7.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • nitrocdn.com adds 895 ms

    895 ms

    nitrocdn.com costs a phone 895 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 524 ms

    524 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 524 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    381 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (381 KiB).

  • salemove.com adds 228 ms

    228 ms

    salemove.com costs a phone 228 ms of main-thread work and 428 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,101 HTML elements

    The page has 2,101 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google CDN adds 122 ms

    122 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 122 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 214 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    115 KiB

    About 115 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    35 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 44 ms

    44 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 44 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 43.9 s

    43.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 43.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Your largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 133 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 150 ms

    150 ms

    Real visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 676 ms

    676 ms

    Real visitors wait 676 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.083

    0.083

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.083, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 14.2 MB in 172 requests

    14.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.2 MB in 172 requests on a phone: media 7.0 MB (4), scripts 3.6 MB (84) and other files 3.0 MB (48). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.03 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.03 g of CO₂e: 483.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9695
  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9287
  • Title is long (71 characters)

    Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Quontic Digital Bank | Online Checking, Savings, and Mortgage Solutions”.

  • Structured data has 4 problems

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Corporation, ImageObject and Organization) but with 4 problems, for example “SiteNavigationElement: url is not an absolute URL ("https://www.quontic.com/banking/")”.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 229 internal links, 37 external

    The homepage links to 229 pages on quontic.com and 37 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 110 characters

    Your meta description is 110 characters: “Experience Quontic, a mission-driven digital bank offering innovative checking, savings, and mortgage options.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We’re closing on a new home.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.quontic.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.quontic.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.quontic.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; logo and description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,325 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.quontic.com/banking/checking/high-interest-checking, https://www.quontic.com/banking/checking/wearable-checking, https://www.quontic.com/banking/savings/high-yield-savings, https://www.quontic.com/banking/savings/3-month-certificate-of-deposit, https://www.quontic.com/banking/savings/6-month-certificate-of-deposit and https://www.quontic.com/banking/savings/12-month-certificate-of-deposit and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://www.quontic.com/banking/checking, https://www.quontic.com/banking/checking/high-interest-checking, https://www.quontic.com/banking/checking/wearable-checking, https://www.quontic.com/banking/checking/money-market-account, https://www.quontic.com/banking/savings/high-yield-savings and https://www.quontic.com/banking/savings/certificates-of-deposit have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.quontic.com/banking/checking/wearable-checking has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 72 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'split')”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 810 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 810 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Start here”, “Contact Us” and “Learn more”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quontic.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on quontic.com, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25