Website review, no card needed
rahal.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202648 issues · 94 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on rahal.com, 20 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 81 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 77 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 74 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.6 s · 748 KiBAbout 748 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.0 s36 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 39
39/100Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 3.6 MB28 images could be 3.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 1.9 MB and 797 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
740 ms · 173 KiBAbout 173 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 740 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 335 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (335 KiB).
YouTube adds 493 ms
493 msYouTube costs a phone 493 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 215 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.28
0.28For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 8.5 s
8.5 sThe first text or image appears after 8.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.3 s
23.3 sYour largest element takes 23.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 24.8 s
24.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.255
0.255The layout shifts by 0.255 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 251 ms
251 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 251 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 81 ms to 74 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 475 ms
475 msReal visitors wait 475 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.4 MB in 159 requests
7.4 MBYour homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 159 requests on a phone: images 5.3 MB (69), scripts 1.5 MB (44) and fonts 272 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 2.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
9 images far larger than shown
773 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 260921-175733261-Indy-091826KM-22634.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 773 KiB.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (3.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
8 images in older formats
8 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.11 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.11 g of CO₂e: 253.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
41 images without alt text
41 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
15 links without text
15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
10 form fields without a label
10 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 11 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Foster Won His Second Career INDYCAR Pole for the…”, “Vanda Pharmaceuticals To Be Primary Sponsor Of Sc…” and “Rahal Earned His First Podium Since 2023 With Thi…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (170 characters)
Your meta description is 170 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
78 internal links, 49 external
The homepage links to 78 pages on rahal.com and 49 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Homepage - Rahal Letterman Lanigan”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://rahal.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rahal.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://rahal.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (458 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://rahal.com/no-59-rll-team-mclaren is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
15 pages share a meta description
https://rahal.com/news, https://rahal.com/schedule, https://rahal.com/no-15-indycar, https://rahal.com/no-45-indycar, https://rahal.com/no-47-indycar-team and https://rahal.com/galleries and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
10 pages without an H1
https://rahal.com/schedule, https://rahal.com/no-15-indycar, https://rahal.com/no-45-indycar, https://rahal.com/no-47-indycar-team, https://rahal.com/galleries and https://rahal.com/videos and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://rahal.com/imsa has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 35 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 36 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 11-field form
Your longest form asks for 11 fields (3 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 314 words of copy
The homepage carries about 314 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
4 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Schedule”, “Contact” and “Subscribe”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rahal.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1991
- Headquarters
- Brownsburg
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on rahal.com, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.