Website review, no card needed

raheja.com logo

raheja.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202653 issues · 96 checks

This review found 53 issues worth fixing on raheja.com, 19 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.8 sMay 2Oct 172.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
146 ms112 msMay 2Oct 17142 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026116 ms
May 9, 2026118 ms
May 16, 2026116 ms
May 23, 2026119 ms
May 30, 2026127 ms
Jun 6, 2026125 ms
Jun 13, 2026136 ms
Jun 20, 2026130 ms
Jun 27, 2026132 ms
Jul 4, 2026130 ms
Jul 11, 2026123 ms
Jul 18, 2026129 ms
Jul 25, 2026127 ms
Aug 1, 2026123 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026119 ms
Aug 22, 2026119 ms
Aug 29, 2026126 ms
Sep 5, 2026129 ms
Sep 12, 2026131 ms
Sep 19, 2026131 ms
Sep 26, 2026134 ms
Oct 3, 2026129 ms
Oct 10, 2026134 ms
Oct 17, 2026142 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of raheja.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. raheja.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. raheja.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  3. raheja.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  4. raheja.com at 6.1 s6.1 s
  5. raheja.com at 7.6 s7.6 s
  6. raheja.com at 9.1 s9.1 s
  7. raheja.com at 10.6 s10.6 s
  8. raheja.com at 12.1 s12.1 s

Speed

11 to fix63
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 28.1 MB

    145 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (28.1 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 17.1 MB

    107 images could be 17.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and cloudfront.net and others), adding 1.0 MB and 916 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63 (desktop: 67). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 615 ms

    615 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 615 ms of main-thread work and 670 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 94 KiB

    About 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    387 KiB

    About 387 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 3.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,563 HTML elements

    The page has 2,563 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 245 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    41 KiB

    41 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 29.1 s

    29.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 29.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.3 s

    13.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Your largest element takes 4.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Raheja Developers is one of the largest Real Estate compani…”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.5 s).

  • Total Blocking Time: 394 ms

    394 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 394 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 142 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 133 ms

    133 ms

    Real visitors wait 133 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 30.6 MB in 203 requests

    30.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 30.6 MB in 203 requests on a phone: images 27.3 MB (127), scripts 2.0 MB (32) and stylesheets 478 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 10 images over 500 KB

    10 images weigh 18.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 35 images far larger than shown

    11.6 MB

    35 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Aerial Night View (1)20260713152051.jpg at 4,200 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 11.6 MB.

  • 40 images in older formats

    40 images (26.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 37 images below the first screen load straight away

    37 images further down the page (19.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 8.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.66 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.66 g of CO₂e: 1039.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

15 to fixGoogle 5377
  • 14 buttons without a name

    14 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 31 text elements with low contrast

    31 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 163 images without alt text

    163 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (43 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 109 links without text

    109 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 11 form fields without a label

    11 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (8 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (8 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 14 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7786
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Legacy of Raheja” and “Leela Sky Villas By Raheja Developers: Space, Exc…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (179 characters)

    Your meta description is 179 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 168 internal links, 56 external

    The homepage links to 168 pages on raheja.com and 56 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Raheja Developers - Top Real Estate Builders in Gurgaon”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://raheja.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://raheja.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://raheja.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,634 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 7 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://raheja.com/projects/new-launch, https://raheja.com/residential, https://raheja.com/projects/ready-to-move-resdential, https://raheja.com/projects/resdential-under-construction, https://raheja.com/projects/plotted-developer and https://raheja.com/projects/affordable and 1 other declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 6 pages share a title

    https://raheja.com/projects/new-launch, https://raheja.com/projects/ready-to-move-resdential, https://raheja.com/projects/resdential-under-construction, https://raheja.com/projects/plotted-developer, https://raheja.com/projects/affordable and https://raheja.com/projects/premium-projects all use the title “Raheja Project List”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 7 pages share a meta description

    https://raheja.com/projects/new-launch, https://raheja.com/residential, https://raheja.com/projects/ready-to-move-resdential, https://raheja.com/projects/resdential-under-construction, https://raheja.com/projects/plotted-developer and https://raheja.com/projects/affordable and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://raheja.com/company-overview.html, https://raheja.com/company-vision.html, https://raheja.com/company-logo.html, https://raheja.com/company-awards.html, https://raheja.com/ar-nayan-raheja.html and https://raheja.com/navin-m-raheja.html and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    82 of 82 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,860 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,860 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 24 calls to action

    The homepage has 24 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Buy Now”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks, 12 customer or partner logos and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 21 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at raheja.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1990
Headquarters
New Delhi

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 53 issues on raheja.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
raheja.com website review: scores and fixes | Programmable