Website review, no card needed
raheja.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202653 issues · 96 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on raheja.com, 19 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 118 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 142 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.3 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.
Font display
1.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
550 ms · 28.1 MB145 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (28.1 MB).
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 17.1 MB107 images could be 17.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and cloudfront.net and others), adding 1.0 MB and 916 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 63
63/100Your mobile performance score is 63 (desktop: 67). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 615 ms
615 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 615 ms of main-thread work and 670 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 94 KiBAbout 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
387 KiBAbout 387 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Main-thread work: 3.8 s
A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,563 HTML elements
The page has 2,563 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 245 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
41 KiB41 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 29.1 s
29.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.3 s
13.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s
3.1 sThe first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.0 s
4.0 sYour largest element takes 4.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Raheja Developers is one of the largest Real Estate compani…”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.5 s).
Total Blocking Time: 394 ms
394 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 394 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 142 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 133 ms
133 msReal visitors wait 133 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 30.6 MB in 203 requests
30.6 MBYour homepage downloads 30.6 MB in 203 requests on a phone: images 27.3 MB (127), scripts 2.0 MB (32) and stylesheets 478 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images over 500 KB
10 images weigh 18.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
35 images far larger than shown
11.6 MB35 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Aerial Night View (1)20260713152051.jpg at 4,200 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 11.6 MB.
40 images in older formats
40 images (26.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
37 images below the first screen load straight away
37 images further down the page (19.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 8.7 g of CO₂ per visit
8.66 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.66 g of CO₂e: 1039.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
14 buttons without a name
14 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
31 text elements with low contrast
31 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
163 images without alt text
163 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (43 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
109 links without text
109 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
11 form fields without a label
11 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (8 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (8 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
36 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 14 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Legacy of Raheja” and “Leela Sky Villas By Raheja Developers: Space, Exc…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (179 characters)
Your meta description is 179 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
168 internal links, 56 external
The homepage links to 168 pages on raheja.com and 56 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Raheja Developers - Top Real Estate Builders in Gurgaon”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://raheja.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://raheja.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://raheja.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,634 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
7 pages point its canonical at the homepage
https://raheja.com/projects/new-launch, https://raheja.com/residential, https://raheja.com/projects/ready-to-move-resdential, https://raheja.com/projects/resdential-under-construction, https://raheja.com/projects/plotted-developer and https://raheja.com/projects/affordable and 1 other declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
6 pages share a title
https://raheja.com/projects/new-launch, https://raheja.com/projects/ready-to-move-resdential, https://raheja.com/projects/resdential-under-construction, https://raheja.com/projects/plotted-developer, https://raheja.com/projects/affordable and https://raheja.com/projects/premium-projects all use the title “Raheja Project List”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages share a meta description
https://raheja.com/projects/new-launch, https://raheja.com/residential, https://raheja.com/projects/ready-to-move-resdential, https://raheja.com/projects/resdential-under-construction, https://raheja.com/projects/plotted-developer and https://raheja.com/projects/affordable and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages without an H1
https://raheja.com/company-overview.html, https://raheja.com/company-vision.html, https://raheja.com/company-logo.html, https://raheja.com/company-awards.html, https://raheja.com/ar-nayan-raheja.html and https://raheja.com/navin-m-raheja.html and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
82 of 82 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,860 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,860 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
24 calls to action
The homepage has 24 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Buy Now”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks, 12 customer or partner logos and 4 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at raheja.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1990
- Headquarters
- New Delhi
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 53 issues on raheja.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.