Website review, no card needed

rare.org logo

rare.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202647 issues · 93 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on rare.org, 17 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.7 sMay 9Oct 242.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
200 ms130 msMay 9Oct 24178 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026192 ms
May 16, 2026166 ms
May 23, 2026161 ms
May 30, 2026160 ms
Jun 6, 2026154 ms
Jun 13, 2026143 ms
Jun 20, 2026149 ms
Jun 27, 2026149 ms
Jul 4, 2026142 ms
Jul 11, 2026172 ms
Jul 18, 2026157 ms
Jul 25, 2026162 ms
Aug 1, 2026152 ms
Aug 8, 2026141 ms
Aug 15, 2026141 ms
Aug 22, 2026142 ms
Aug 29, 2026161 ms
Sep 5, 2026179 ms
Sep 12, 2026176 ms
Sep 19, 2026174 ms
Sep 26, 2026163 ms
Oct 3, 2026138 ms
Oct 10, 2026166 ms
Oct 17, 2026166 ms
Oct 24, 2026178 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rare.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rare.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. rare.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. rare.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. rare.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. rare.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. rare.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. rare.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. rare.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

13 to fix34
  • Improve image delivery

    2.0 s · 7.8 MB

    14 images could be 7.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • classy.org adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    classy.org costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (classy.org, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 4.6 MB and 3.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 2.3 MB

    About 2.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 872 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (872 KiB).

  • Google CDN adds 959 ms

    959 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 959 ms of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 698 ms

    698 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 698 ms of main-thread work and 685 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 127 KiB

    About 127 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 420 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 215 ms

    215 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 215 ms of main-thread work and 316 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 28 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 45.5 s

    45.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 45.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Your largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 203 ms

    203 ms

    Real visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 192 ms to 178 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.054

    0.054

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.054, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 16.6 MB in 236 requests

    16.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.6 MB in 236 requests on a phone: images 9.5 MB (35), scripts 5.5 MB (103) and other files 799 KiB (51). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (96 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (140 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.71 g of CO₂e: 564.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8891
  • 12 buttons without a name

    12 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Global Environmental Nonprofit Organization for Conservation – Rare”.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 74 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 74 pages on rare.org and 19 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “Explore Rare, an environmental nonprofit empowering communities to protect nature, conserve biodiversity, and fight cli…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Real stories. Real impact.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://rare.org/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rare.org/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://rare.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (793 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://rare.org/region/africa is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://rare.org/region/africa has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://rare.org/news, https://rare.org/program/lands-for-life, https://rare.org/priority/protecting-biodiversity, https://rare.org/priority/climate, https://rare.org/program/innovative-finance and https://rare.org/program/fish-forever and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://rare.org/news and https://rare.org/program/innovative-finance took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 834 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 834 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Join Us” and “Subscribe”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Plausible.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 40 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rare.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Plausible

Company

Employees
87
Founded
1973
Headquarters
Arlington County

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on rare.org, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25