Website review, no card needed
raregrp.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202635 issues · 73 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on raregrp.com, 18 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.2 s · 5.4 MB88 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
8.2 s25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.2 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.7 s · 627 KiBAbout 627 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 533 KiBAbout 533 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Font display
3.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).
Document request latency
1.0 s · 197 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive about 1.0 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
1.0 sReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.0 s on a phone.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 2.2 MB12 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 56). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
1,986 HTML elements
The page has 1,986 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 1.1 s
1.1 sYour server takes 1.1 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 110 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Fonts), adding 234 KiB and 49 ms of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.4 s
A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 462 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.1 s
6.1 sReal visitors wait 6.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.2 s
5.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 9.4 s
9.4 sThe first text or image appears after 9.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.5 s
18.5 sYour largest element takes 18.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (11.5 s).
Speed Index: 23.9 s
23.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 23.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 21.6 s
21.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.052
0.052The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.052, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 32 ms
32 msScripts block the page for only 32 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.2 MB in 99 requests
6.2 MBYour homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 99 requests on a phone: images 3.9 MB (47), scripts 1.1 MB (22) and stylesheets 752 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images in older formats
11 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
93 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example rare_logo-min.png at 2,560 px wide, shown at 26 px. Resized copies would save about 93 KiB.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.76 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.76 g of CO₂e: 211.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 89 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Premium IFM Solutions For Every Facility Needs” and “Proven Impact, Across Industries”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (176 characters)
Your meta description is 176 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
83 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 83 pages on raregrp.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Integrated Facility Management & Infection Control Solutions”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://raregrp.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://raregrp.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://raregrp.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,144 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
About 522 words of copy
The homepage carries about 522 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Schedule A Consultation”.
23 calls to action
The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Request a Consultation” and “Schedule A Consultation”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at raregrp.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CtrlS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on raregrp.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.