Website review, no card needed

rbo.org.uk logo

rbo.org.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202637 issues · 78 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on rbo.org.uk, 11 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 312.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
292 ms194 msMay 16Oct 31277 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026205 ms
May 23, 2026208 ms
May 30, 2026212 ms
Jun 6, 2026216 ms
Jun 13, 2026220 ms
Jun 20, 2026221 ms
Jun 27, 2026229 ms
Jul 4, 2026244 ms
Jul 11, 2026261 ms
Jul 18, 2026273 ms
Jul 25, 2026281 ms
Aug 1, 2026281 ms
Aug 8, 2026274 ms
Aug 15, 2026272 ms
Aug 22, 2026274 ms
Aug 29, 2026278 ms
Sep 5, 2026277 ms
Sep 12, 2026272 ms
Sep 19, 2026272 ms
Sep 26, 2026271 ms
Oct 3, 2026270 ms
Oct 10, 2026270 ms
Oct 17, 2026268 ms
Oct 24, 2026271 ms
Oct 31, 2026277 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rbo.org.uk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rbo.org.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. rbo.org.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. rbo.org.uk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. rbo.org.uk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. rbo.org.uk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. rbo.org.uk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. rbo.org.uk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. rbo.org.uk at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix41
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10.2 s · 2.0 MB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.0 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.3 s · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Pinterest and others), adding 1.2 MB and 769 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 613 ms

    613 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 613 ms of main-thread work and 882 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 311 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,336 HTML elements

    The page has 2,336 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 237 KiB

    12 images could be 237 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 46 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.5 s

    22.5 s

    Your largest element takes 22.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “An open view of the interior of a house with two floors whi…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.2 s

    24.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 203 ms

    203 ms

    Real visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 33% slower for real visitors

    +33%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 205 ms to 277 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 597 ms

    597 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 597 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 569 ms

    569 ms

    Real visitors wait 569 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix63
  • Page weight: 4.3 MB in 119 requests

    4.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 119 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (31), images 1.2 MB (52) and fonts 323 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 18 images below the first screen load straight away

    18 images further down the page (648 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 147.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9095
  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 91 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 17 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 18 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 17 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 9066
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 86 links with vague text

    86 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Title is short (22 characters)

    Your title is only 22 characters: “Royal Ballet and Opera”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (48 characters)

    Your meta description is only 48 characters: “New worlds await with the Royal Ballet and Opera”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 181 internal links, 34 external

    The homepage links to 181 pages on rbo.org.uk and 34 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rbo.org.uk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rbo.org.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,206 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 3 pages without a title

    https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-joseph-sissens-digital, https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-calvin-richardson-digital and https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on-melissa-hamilton-digital have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-joseph-sissens-digital, https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-calvin-richardson-digital and https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on-melissa-hamilton-digital have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-joseph-sissens-digital, https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-calvin-richardson-digital and https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on-melissa-hamilton-digital have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-joseph-sissens-digital, https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-calvin-richardson-digital and https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on-melissa-hamilton-digital have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 10 pages slow to respond

    https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/the-nutcracker-peter-wright, https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/the-magic-flute-david-mcvicar, https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/gotterdammerung-barrie-kosky, https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/cosi-fan-tutte-netia-jones, https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/swan-lake-marius-petipa and https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/tosca-oliver-mears and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to manifest at 'https://static.roh.org.uk/images/favicons_rbo/site.webmanifest' from origin 'https://www.rbo.org…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    170 of 173 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 3,007 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 3,007 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up for emails”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Sign up for emails”, “Subscribe to watch” and “Sign up”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rbo.org.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Akamai

Company

Employees
1,213
Founded
1732

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on rbo.org.uk, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25