Website review, no card needed
rbo.org.uk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202637 issues · 78 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on rbo.org.uk, 11 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 205 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 208 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 277 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
10.2 s · 2.0 MB36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.0 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
7.3 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Pinterest and others), adding 1.2 MB and 769 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 613 ms
613 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 613 ms of main-thread work and 882 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 311 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,336 HTML elements
The page has 2,336 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 237 KiB12 images could be 237 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 46 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Minify JavaScript
13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 9.2 s
9.2 sThe first text or image appears after 9.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.5 s
22.5 sYour largest element takes 22.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “An open view of the interior of a house with two floors whi…”.
Time to Interactive: 24.2 s
24.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.0 s
10.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 203 ms
203 msReal visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 33% slower for real visitors
+33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 205 ms to 277 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 597 ms
597 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 597 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 569 ms
569 msReal visitors wait 569 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 119 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 119 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (31), images 1.2 MB (52) and fonts 323 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
18 images below the first screen load straight away
18 images further down the page (648 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 147.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 91 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
17 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 18 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 17 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
86 links with vague text
86 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Title is short (22 characters)
Your title is only 22 characters: “Royal Ballet and Opera”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (48 characters)
Your meta description is only 48 characters: “New worlds await with the Royal Ballet and Opera”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
181 internal links, 34 external
The homepage links to 181 pages on rbo.org.uk and 34 external pages.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rbo.org.uk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.rbo.org.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,206 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages without a title
https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-joseph-sissens-digital, https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-calvin-richardson-digital and https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on-melissa-hamilton-digital have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-joseph-sissens-digital, https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-calvin-richardson-digital and https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on-melissa-hamilton-digital have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-joseph-sissens-digital, https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-calvin-richardson-digital and https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on-melissa-hamilton-digital have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-joseph-sissens-digital, https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on...-calvin-richardson-digital and https://www.rbo.org.uk/tickets-and-events/spotlight-on-melissa-hamilton-digital have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
10 pages slow to respond
https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/the-nutcracker-peter-wright, https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/the-magic-flute-david-mcvicar, https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/gotterdammerung-barrie-kosky, https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/cosi-fan-tutte-netia-jones, https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/swan-lake-marius-petipa and https://www.rbo.org.uk/production/tosca-oliver-mears and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to manifest at 'https://static.roh.org.uk/images/favicons_rbo/site.webmanifest' from origin 'https://www.rbo.org…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
170 of 173 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 3,007 words of copy
The homepage carries about 3,007 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up for emails”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Sign up for emails”, “Subscribe to watch” and “Sign up”.
1 short form
A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rbo.org.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Akamai
Company
- Employees
- 1,213
- Founded
- 1732
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on rbo.org.uk, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.