Website review, no card needed
rd.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202622 issues · 79 checks
This review found 22 issues worth fixing on rd.com, 7 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 183 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 174 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 146 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.4 s · 726 KiB12 images could be 726 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 70
70/100Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 98). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 43 KiB43 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 34 KiBAbout 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 10 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 65 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (trueanthem.com, Cloudflare and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 49 KiB and 23 ms of main-thread time.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 98 but mobile only 70. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 123 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.2 s
6.2 sYour largest element takes 6.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “This Food Is Actually Healthier as a Leftover”.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.1 s
5.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 6.2 s
6.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
10 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 167 ms
167 msReal visitors wait 167 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 340 ms
340 msReal visitors wait 340 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 146 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 15 ms
15 msScripts block the page for only 15 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
5 images in older formats
5 images (208 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.40 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.40 g of CO₂e: 47.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Page weight: 1.4 MB in 54 requests
1.4 MBYour homepage downloads 1.4 MB in 54 requests on a phone: images 973 KiB (16), fonts 194 KiB (5) and scripts 137 KiB (23). That is a lean page.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
11 links without text
11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
150 internal links, 33 external
The homepage links to 150 pages on rd.com and 33 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 138 characters
Your meta description is 138 characters: “Updated daily! Inspiring stories, hilarious jokes, and surprising advice on health, weight loss & more. Plus subscribe …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The Scariest Movie from the Year You Were Born”.
Title: 62 characters
Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Reader’s Digest: Official Site to Subscribe & Find Great Reads”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.rd.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rd.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.rd.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (881 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 120 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
4 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.rd.com/.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “No TMBI Bytes modules found on the page.”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 608 words of copy
The homepage carries about 608 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “newsletter signup icon” and “Contact Us”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Ketch) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
27 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Ketch
A consent management tool (Ketch) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rd.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
Company
- Founded
- 1922
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 22 issues on rd.com, including 11 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.