Website review, no card needed
regenbogenmamas.de website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202638 issues · 77 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on regenbogenmamas.de, 14 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.3 s
2.0 s
2.7 s
3.4 s
4.0 s
4.7 s
5.4 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.2 s · 19.2 MB110 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (19.2 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.5 s41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.7 s · 1.8 MBAbout 1.8 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 2.1 MBAbout 2.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Calendly, coredelivr.com and Stripe and others), adding 3.7 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Calendly adds 757 ms
757 msCalendly costs a phone 757 ms of main-thread work and 3.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
850 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 848 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 4.0 s
A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Stripe adds 171 ms
171 msStripe costs a phone 171 ms of main-thread work and 305 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 37 KiB37 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
103 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 103 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Improve image delivery
39 KiB1 image could be 39 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 159 ms
159 msYour server sent the HTML in 159 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Speed Index: 15.8 s
15.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 38.8 s
38.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 38.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.5 s
7.5 sYour largest element takes 7.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s
4.8 sThe first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.111
0.111The layout shifts by 0.111 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 22.6 MB in 136 requests
22.6 MBYour homepage downloads 22.6 MB in 136 requests on a phone: media 16.2 MB (1), scripts 3.7 MB (60) and stylesheets 2.0 MB (38). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
23 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example luma-pimentel-1vnB2l7j3bY-unsplash-web-1zu1.jpg at 1,280 px wide, shown at 312 px. Resized copies would save about 23 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (49 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 6.4 g of CO₂ per visit
6.39 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.39 g of CO₂e: 767.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
16 text elements with low contrast
16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
14 tap targets too small
14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (87 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 87 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (23 characters)
Your title is only 23 characters: “Start - Regenbogenmamas”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at regenbogenmamas.de/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
22 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 22 pages on regenbogenmamas.de and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Wenn das eigene Kind während der Schwangerschaft, Geburt oder kurz danach stirbt, prägt dieser Verlust das weitere Lebe…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Regenbogenmamas –deine Begleitung in der Folgeschwangerschaft”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://regenbogenmamas.de/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://regenbogenmamas.de/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,875 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without an H1
https://regenbogenmamas.de/regenbogenmamas-2-be has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://regenbogenmamas.de/regenbogenmamas-2-be has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
2 pages slow to respond
https://regenbogenmamas.de/masterclass-in-vertrauen-durch-das-1-trimester and https://regenbogenmamas.de/podcast took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
9 internal pages checked
We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Fenced Frame API is deprecated and scheduled for removal.”).
1 small tap target
1 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page is smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 34 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 13-field form
Your longest form asks for 13 fields (6 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,813 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,813 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at regenbogenmamas.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Hotjar
- Hosting
- Strato GmbH
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on regenbogenmamas.de, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.