Website review, no card needed

remax.pt logo

remax.pt website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202640 issues · 82 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on remax.pt, 14 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.4 sMay 16Oct 312.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
369 ms341 msMay 16Oct 31360 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026344 ms
May 23, 2026344 ms
May 30, 2026344 ms
Jun 6, 2026349 ms
Jun 13, 2026353 ms
Jun 20, 2026356 ms
Jun 27, 2026360 ms
Jul 4, 2026363 ms
Jul 11, 2026364 ms
Jul 18, 2026365 ms
Jul 25, 2026365 ms
Aug 1, 2026365 ms
Aug 8, 2026365 ms
Aug 15, 2026366 ms
Aug 22, 2026364 ms
Aug 29, 2026361 ms
Sep 5, 2026359 ms
Sep 12, 2026358 ms
Sep 19, 2026359 ms
Sep 26, 2026362 ms
Oct 3, 2026361 ms
Oct 10, 2026360 ms
Oct 17, 2026361 ms
Oct 24, 2026359 ms
Oct 31, 2026360 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of remax.pt (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. remax.pt at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. remax.pt at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. remax.pt at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. remax.pt at 2.7 s2.7 s
  5. remax.pt at 3.4 s3.4 s
  6. remax.pt at 4.1 s4.1 s
  7. remax.pt at 4.8 s4.8 s
  8. remax.pt at 5.5 s5.5 s

Speed

10 to fix48
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    8.2 MB

    20 images could be 8.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and deskbolt.com and others), adding 9.8 MB and 801 ms of main-thread time.

  • maxwork.pt adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    maxwork.pt costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 8.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 450 ms

    450 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 450 ms of main-thread work and 644 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    400 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • deskbolt.com adds 65 ms

    65 ms

    deskbolt.com costs a phone 65 ms of main-thread work and 297 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 63 KiB

    About 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 211 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    67 KiB

    67 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    45 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (45 KiB).

  • Minify CSS

    18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 373 ms

    373 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 373 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.97

    0.97

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.97 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.1 s

    9.1 s

    Your largest element takes 9.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “home background”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.8 s

    16.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 355 ms

    355 ms

    Real visitors wait 355 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 579 ms

    579 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 579 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.171

    0.171

    The layout shifts by 0.171 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 17 images without width and height

    17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 344 ms to 360 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 743 ms

    743 ms

    Real visitors wait 743 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 11.4 MB in 151 requests

    11.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.4 MB in 151 requests on a phone: images 8.9 MB (31), scripts 1.8 MB (56) and other files 525 KiB (55). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 7.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    1.7 MB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example development-main.png at 1,536 px wide, shown at 336 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.

  • 18 images in older formats

    18 images (8.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 13 images below the first screen load straight away

    13 images further down the page (8.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.24 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.24 g of CO₂e: 388.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9493
  • Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets (1 element)

    Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10088
  • Title is short (15 characters)

    Your title is only 15 characters: “RE/MAX Portugal”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (181 characters)

    Your meta description is 181 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 47 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on remax.pt and 11 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Muito mais que uma casa, é a sua casa.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://remax.pt/pt.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://remax.pt/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://remax.pt/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (281 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://remax.pt/pt and https://remax.pt/pt/recrutamento all use the title “RE/MAX Portugal”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://remax.pt/pt/recrutamento, https://remax.pt/pt/procuro-imovel, https://remax.pt/pt/institucional/comprarcomconfianca and https://remax.pt/pt/quantovaleaminhacasa use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://remax.pt/pt/bolsadeoportunidades, whose canonical is https://remax.pt/pt/comprar/imoveis/habitacao/r/r/r/t,oportunidade. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://remax.pt/pt/recrutamento, https://remax.pt/pt/comprar-empreendimentos, https://remax.pt/pt/procuro-imovel, https://remax.pt/pt/bolsadeoportunidades, https://remax.pt/pt/propostasmultiplas and https://remax.pt/pt/institucional/comprarcomconfianca and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    42 of 42 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 313 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 313 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at remax.pt, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Founded
1973
Headquarters
Denver

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on remax.pt, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25