Website review, no card needed
remax.pt website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202640 issues · 82 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on remax.pt, 14 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 344 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 344 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 344 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 349 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 356 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 360 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 363 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 365 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 365 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 365 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 365 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 366 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 361 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 358 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 362 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 361 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 360 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 361 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 360 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
8.2 MB20 images could be 8.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and deskbolt.com and others), adding 9.8 MB and 801 ms of main-thread time.
maxwork.pt adds 0 ms
0 msmaxwork.pt costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 8.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 450 ms
450 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 450 ms of main-thread work and 644 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
400 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 38 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.7 s
A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
deskbolt.com adds 65 ms
65 msdeskbolt.com costs a phone 65 ms of main-thread work and 297 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 63 KiBAbout 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 211 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
67 KiB67 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
45 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (45 KiB).
Minify CSS
18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 373 ms
373 msYour server sent the HTML in 373 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.97
0.97For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.97 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.1 s
9.1 sYour largest element takes 9.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “home background”.
Time to Interactive: 16.8 s
16.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.9 s
5.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 355 ms
355 msReal visitors wait 355 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 579 ms
579 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 579 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.171
0.171The layout shifts by 0.171 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
17 images without width and height
17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 344 ms to 360 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 743 ms
743 msReal visitors wait 743 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.4 MB in 151 requests
11.4 MBYour homepage downloads 11.4 MB in 151 requests on a phone: images 8.9 MB (31), scripts 1.8 MB (56) and other files 525 KiB (55). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images over 500 KB
5 images weigh 7.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
1.7 MB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example development-main.png at 1,536 px wide, shown at 336 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.
18 images in older formats
18 images (8.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
13 images below the first screen load straight away
13 images further down the page (8.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit
3.24 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.24 g of CO₂e: 388.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets (1 element)
Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (15 characters)
Your title is only 15 characters: “RE/MAX Portugal”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (181 characters)
Your meta description is 181 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
47 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 47 pages on remax.pt and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Muito mais que uma casa, é a sua casa.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://remax.pt/pt.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://remax.pt/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://remax.pt/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (281 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://remax.pt/pt and https://remax.pt/pt/recrutamento all use the title “RE/MAX Portugal”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages share a meta description
https://remax.pt/pt/recrutamento, https://remax.pt/pt/procuro-imovel, https://remax.pt/pt/institucional/comprarcomconfianca and https://remax.pt/pt/quantovaleaminhacasa use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://remax.pt/pt/bolsadeoportunidades, whose canonical is https://remax.pt/pt/comprar/imoveis/habitacao/r/r/r/t,oportunidade. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
https://remax.pt/pt/recrutamento, https://remax.pt/pt/comprar-empreendimentos, https://remax.pt/pt/procuro-imovel, https://remax.pt/pt/bolsadeoportunidades, https://remax.pt/pt/propostasmultiplas and https://remax.pt/pt/institucional/comprarcomconfianca and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
42 of 42 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 313 words of copy
The homepage carries about 313 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at remax.pt, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Founded
- 1973
- Headquarters
- Denver
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on remax.pt, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.