Website review, no card needed

remaxalfa.cz logo

remaxalfa.cz website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202639 issues · 91 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on remaxalfa.cz, 19 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.6 sMay 2Oct 172.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.9 s
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
165 ms140 msMay 2Oct 17161 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026147 ms
May 9, 2026143 ms
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026148 ms
May 30, 2026147 ms
Jun 6, 2026149 ms
Jun 13, 2026146 ms
Jun 20, 2026146 ms
Jun 27, 2026148 ms
Jul 4, 2026145 ms
Jul 11, 2026150 ms
Jul 18, 2026151 ms
Jul 25, 2026149 ms
Aug 1, 2026153 ms
Aug 8, 2026154 ms
Aug 15, 2026154 ms
Aug 22, 2026154 ms
Aug 29, 2026155 ms
Sep 5, 2026159 ms
Sep 12, 2026159 ms
Sep 19, 2026161 ms
Sep 26, 2026160 ms
Oct 3, 2026162 ms
Oct 10, 2026161 ms
Oct 17, 2026161 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of remaxalfa.cz (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. remaxalfa.cz at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. remaxalfa.cz at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. remaxalfa.cz at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. remaxalfa.cz at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. remaxalfa.cz at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. remaxalfa.cz at 3.3 s3.3 s
  7. remaxalfa.cz at 3.8 s3.8 s
  8. remaxalfa.cz at 4.3 s4.3 s

Speed

9 to fix58
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.0 s · 775 KiB

    About 775 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.5 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 298 KiB

    8 images could be 298 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.0 s · 192 KiB

    About 192 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and seznam.cz and others), adding 1.3 MB and 691 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 332 ms

    332 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 332 ms of main-thread work and 505 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 284 ms

    284 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 284 ms of main-thread work and 731 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 140 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    41 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (41 KiB).

  • Minify JavaScript

    16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 91 but mobile only 58. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 223 ms

    223 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 223 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.3 s

    19.3 s

    Your largest element takes 19.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Abychom poskytli co nejlepší služby, používáme k ukládání a…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.2 s

    22.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • 42 images without width and height

    42 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 161 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 133 ms

    133 ms

    Real visitors wait 133 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 179 ms

    179 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 179 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 4.3 MB in 127 requests

    4.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 127 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (50), images 1.5 MB (52) and other files 350 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    35 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example dum-na-prodej.jpg at 900 px wide, shown at 222 px. Resized copies would save about 35 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (77 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.21 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.21 g of CO₂e: 144.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8083
  • 17 text elements with low contrast

    17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Links look like plain text

    5 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (42 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 42 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (5 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 29 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 29 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Title is short (24 characters)

    Your title is only 24 characters: “REMAX, realitní kancelář”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (174 characters)

    Your meta description is 174 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 272 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 272 pages on remaxalfa.cz and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Prodáváme nemovitostichytře a s výsledky”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.remaxalfa.cz/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.remaxalfa.cz/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.remaxalfa.cz/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,845 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 7 pages share a meta description

    https://www.remaxalfa.cz/reality, https://www.remaxalfa.cz/reality/byty-prodej, https://www.remaxalfa.cz/reality/domy-prodej, https://www.remaxalfa.cz/reality/pozemky-prodej, https://www.remaxalfa.cz/reality/byty-pronajem and https://www.remaxalfa.cz/reality/domy-pronajem and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 118 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    10 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.remaxalfa.cz/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ALFA_balon_jpg_RBG-web-scaled.png.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,314 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,314 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at remaxalfa.cz, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on remaxalfa.cz, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25