Website review, no card needed

renaware.com logo

renaware.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202642 issues · 87 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on renaware.com, 12 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 313.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.7 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Oct 24, 20263.7 s
Oct 31, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
171 ms94 msMay 16Oct 31125 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026121 ms
May 23, 2026121 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026119 ms
Jun 20, 2026119 ms
Jun 27, 2026112 ms
Jul 4, 2026111 ms
Jul 11, 2026108 ms
Jul 18, 2026103 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026106 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026134 ms
Aug 22, 2026155 ms
Aug 29, 2026162 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026120 ms
Sep 26, 2026120 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026118 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026126 ms
Oct 31, 2026125 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of renaware.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. renaware.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. renaware.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. renaware.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. renaware.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. renaware.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. renaware.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  7. renaware.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  8. renaware.com at 4.8 s4.8 s

Speed

10 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.6 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 295 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (295 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, vtexassets.com and Google CDN and others), adding 3.2 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 525 ms

    525 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 525 ms of main-thread work and 824 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 93 KiB

    About 93 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • vtexassets.com adds 353 ms

    353 ms

    vtexassets.com costs a phone 353 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 59 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 59 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 292 ms

    292 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 292 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    100 ms · 54 KiB

    6 images could be 54 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 148 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 19 ms

    19 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.0 s

    20.0 s

    Your largest element takes 20.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “LEARN MORE VIDEO Press the right arrow key to continue, and…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.2 s

    20.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.15

    0.15

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 29% slower for real visitors

    +29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 427 ms

    427 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 427 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 130 ms

    130 ms

    Real visitors wait 130 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 126 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 126 requests on a phone: scripts 2.5 MB (53), other files 372 KiB (44) and images 313 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.99 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 118.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9689
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 13 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 13 pages on renaware.com and 2 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “Welcome to Rena Ware. Find out about our innovative cookware system and master the art of "Buen Comer". Make flavor a l…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “WHAT MAKES US unique?”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Welcome to Our Home | Rena Ware USA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.renaware.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.renaware.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.renaware.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (200 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix70
  • 2 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.renaware.com/rena-signature-3_5l-with-nutri-sensor-cover/p and https://www.renaware.com/gourmet-set-5-ply-zylstra-series-17-pieces/p, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.renaware.com/cookware, https://www.renaware.com/replacement-parts and https://www.renaware.com/filter-bottle have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages with very little text

    https://www.renaware.com/cookware, https://www.renaware.com/about-us, https://www.renaware.com/integrated-system, https://www.renaware.com/replacement-parts, https://www.renaware.com/filter-bottle and https://www.renaware.com/cooking-methods have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.renaware.com/cookware, https://www.renaware.com/replacement-parts and https://www.renaware.com/filter-bottle took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix79
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 171 words

    The homepage has only about 171 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “LEARN MORE” and “Learn more”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 23 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at renaware.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
CloudFront

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on renaware.com, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25