Website review, no card needed
revivserums.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202651 issues · 97 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on revivserums.com, 22 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #40,788 of 102,930 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #26,648 of 57,283 online storesbeats 47%
- #25,612 of 52,120 Shopify storesbeats 44%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 143 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.9 s
2.5 s
3.1 s
3.7 s
4.4 s
5.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.5 s · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.0 s · 866 KiB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (866 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Signyfyd adds 1.1 s
1.1 sSignyfyd costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 283 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.9 s
A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Signyfyd, Google Tag Manager and Shopify and others), adding 2.9 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
550 ms · 1.7 MB15 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 671 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 321 ms
321 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 321 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 227 ms
227 msShopify costs a phone 227 ms of main-thread work and 975 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 130 ms
130 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 130 ms of main-thread work and 300 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,532 HTML elements
The page has 1,532 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
cloudfront.net adds 101 ms
101 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 101 ms of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 53 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 53 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 95 KiBAbout 95 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify CSS
14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 13 ms
13 msYour server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 28.0 s
28.0 sYour largest element takes 28.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Image”.
Time to Interactive: 35.4 s
35.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.9 s
10.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 792 ms
792 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 792 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 153 ms to 143 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 102 ms
102 msReal visitors wait 102 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 25% faster for real visitors
-25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.9 MB in 390 requests
6.9 MBYour homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 390 requests on a phone: scripts 3.3 MB (133), images 2.0 MB (38) and other files 1.3 MB (186). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images far larger than shown
970 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example RevivHair-REV-Advanced.png at 1,800 px wide, shown at 254 px. Resized copies would save about 970 KiB.
11 images below the first screen load straight away
11 images further down the page (1.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.96 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.96 g of CO₂e: 235.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
21 text elements with low contrast
21 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
16 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings should not be empty (2 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h3 → h6 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (87 characters)
Your title is 87 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Novel, innovative topical serums for hair | skin | lash | brow | body – RevivSerums.com”.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“”, “Next-gen serumswith advanced actives” and “RevivHair Max Hair Stimulating Serum with 5% Rede…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (215 characters)
Your meta description is 215 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
130 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 130 pages on revivserums.com and 7 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.revivserums.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.revivserums.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (837 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.revivserums.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.revivserums.com/products/gift-card declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.revivserums.com/products/gift-card all use the title “Novel, innovative topical serums for hair | skin | lash | brow | body…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.revivserums.com/collections/body has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.revivserums.com/collections and https://www.revivserums.com/products/gift-card use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
12 pages without an H1
https://www.revivserums.com/collections/hair-serums, https://www.revivserums.com/collections/facial-serums, https://www.revivserums.com/products/revivlash-lash-brow-stimulating-serum, https://www.revivserums.com/collections/customizable-serums, https://www.revivserums.com/products/revivlip-lip-serum-system and https://www.revivserums.com/collections/body and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 43 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=11041676&Ver=2&mid=8bf49dd9-3c16-4d52-8575-bf2d8e512703&bo=2&sid=356fed70dd5411f19726759baee34956&vid=35700fd0dd5411f1a007b556e3485fad&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
28 small tap targets
28 of 55 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Expected property name or '}' in JSON at position 4 (line 2 column 3)”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
About 698 words of copy
The homepage carries about 698 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NOW”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop By Concern” and “Contact Us”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 8 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
48 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at revivserums.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 18 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Loyalty Rewards And Referrals · Judge Me Reviews · Google Youtube · Easyban · Simple Affiliate · Product Upsell · Infinite Microsoft Ads Uet Tag · Forms · Facebook Pixel · Key Product Options Variants · signifyd.com · gethypervisual.com · elfsight.com · rontar.com · sfdr.co · jst.ai · cloudfront.net · boldapps.net
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on revivserums.com, including 22 speed issues and 4 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.