Website review, no card needed

rmchospital.com logo

rmchospital.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202643 issues · 88 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on rmchospital.com, 14 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 241.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
72 ms64 msJun 13Oct 2471 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 13, 202667 ms
Jun 27, 202666 ms
Jul 25, 202665 ms
Aug 1, 202666 ms
Aug 8, 202668 ms
Sep 5, 202667 ms
Sep 12, 202670 ms
Sep 19, 202670 ms
Sep 26, 202671 ms
Oct 3, 202670 ms
Oct 10, 202667 ms
Oct 24, 202671 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rmchospital.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rmchospital.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. rmchospital.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. rmchospital.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. rmchospital.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. rmchospital.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. rmchospital.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. rmchospital.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. rmchospital.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix44
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.0 s · 2.2 MB

    49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.2 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 988 KiB

    15 images could be 988 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 165 KiB

    About 165 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    870 ms · 127 KiB

    About 127 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 870 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (allaccessible.org, Facebook and fasthealth.com), adding 1.1 MB and 80 ms of main-thread time.

  • fasthealth.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    fasthealth.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 897 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    23 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Document request latency

    32 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 122 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 67 ms

    67 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 67 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Your largest element takes 9.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Riverside Medical Center”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.157

    1.157

    The layout shifts by 1.157 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 67 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 767 ms

    767 ms

    Real visitors wait 767 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix48
  • 4 images far larger than shown

    586 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 284927.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 388 px. Resized copies would save about 586 KiB.

  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 55 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 55 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (34), scripts 360 KiB (9) and stylesheets 156 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 13 images in older formats

    13 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    284927.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (447 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.67 g of CO₂e: 80.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7884
  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (9 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 9 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9284
  • Title is short (24 characters)

    Your title is only 24 characters: “Riverside Medical Center”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Welcome to Riverside Medical Center”, “View Events” and “Patients & Visitors”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.rmchospital.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 73 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 73 pages on rmchospital.com and 11 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 146 characters

    Your meta description is 146 characters: “Riverside Medical Center, located in Franklinton, LA, is a 25-bed Critical Access Hospital (CAH) serving the western po…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rmchospital.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rmchospital.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (683 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix58
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.rmchospital.com/getpage.php, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 3 pages share a title

    /, https://www.rmchospital.com/ecard and https://www.rmchospital.com/staff/bio.php all use the title “Riverside Medical Center”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.rmchospital.com/calendar, https://www.rmchospital.com/ecard and https://www.rmchospital.com/staff/bio.php have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.rmchospital.com/calendar, whose canonical is https://www.rmchospital.com/calendar/index.php?category=0. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 4 internal pages checked

    We fetched 4 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8885
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.

  • 8 distorted images

    8 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 4 low-resolution images

    4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 447 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 447 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Call Us”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Call Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rmchospital.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Att Internet4

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on rmchospital.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25