Website review, no card needed
roarkrevival.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202635 issues · 86 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on roarkrevival.ca, 13 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 24.8 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74C- #73,266 of 104,033 reviewed websitesbeats 26%
- #45,538 of 58,147 online storesbeats 18%
- #42,820 of 52,947 Shopify storesbeats 16%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 224 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 260 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 24.8 s
A phone's processor spends 24.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 33
33/100Your mobile performance score is 33. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4,968 HTML elements
The page has 4,968 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 2.7 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 1.8 MB17 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google Tag Manager and corso.com and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 502 KiBAbout 502 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 326 KiB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (326 KiB).
Shopify adds 339 ms
339 msShopify costs a phone 339 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
400 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 41 KiBAbout 41 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
29 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
24 KiB24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 668 ms
668 msReal visitors wait 668 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 4.7 s
4.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 4.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 30.3 s
30.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 30.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sYour largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 9.5 s
9.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 224 ms to 260 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 325 ms
325 msReal visitors wait 325 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.059
0.059The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.059, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.3 MB in 437 requests
7.3 MBYour homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 437 requests on a phone: images 3.8 MB (65), scripts 1.9 MB (144) and other files 1.0 MB (207). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
HP-Koa-Pod_2.gif weighs 1.0 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image in older formats
1 image (1.0 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (25 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.08 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.08 g of CO₂e: 250.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (9 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
115 images without alt text
115 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (14 elements).
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Roark Adventure-Ready Men's & Women's Clothing – Tops, Bottoms & Gear”.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Roark”, “Adventure is the gift” and “Adventure is the gift”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (231 characters)
Your meta description is 231 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
18 links crawlers can't follow
18 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
273 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 273 pages on roarkrevival.ca and 14 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://roark.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, Person and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://roark.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and description; logo and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (478 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://roark.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://roark.com/pages/gift has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages with very little text
https://roark.com/collections/best-sellers, https://roark.com/collections/winter-collection-mens-h226 and https://roark.com/collections/shop-all-mens have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 103 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_CLOSED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
53 of 61 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 334 words of copy
The homepage carries about 334 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP ALL GIFTS”.
38 calls to action
The homepage has 38 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Shop All Mens” and “Shop All Tops”.
8 short forms
8 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks and 91 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
53 cookies set on arrival
53Opening the homepage sets 53 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
63 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 63 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at roarkrevival.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 19 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pandectes Gdpr · Sc Easy Redirects · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Postscript Sms Marketing · Microsoft Clarity · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Rivo Loyalty Rewards Referrals · Test Sms · Reviews Co Uk Product And Merchant Review Collection · jsdelivr.net · govx.com · unpkg.com · cloudfront.net · botnot.io · corso.com · noibu.com · esc-apps-cdn.com · nofraud.com · global-e.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on roarkrevival.ca, including 19 speed issues and 5 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.