Website review, no card needed
rodneyclark.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202636 issues · 86 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on rodneyclark.com, 10 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81B- #31,528 of 93,467 reviewed websitesbeats 61%
- #19,967 of 49,951 online storesbeats 54%
- #19,189 of 45,104 Shopify storesbeats 51%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 171 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.2 s
3.2 s
4.3 s
5.4 s
6.5 s
7.5 s
8.6 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.0 s · 346 KiB8 images could be 346 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 6.5 s
A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google Tag Manager and shopassistant-ai.com and others), adding 2.3 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 964 KiBAbout 964 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Shopify adds 567 ms
567 msShopify costs a phone 567 ms of main-thread work and 954 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
650 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
527 KiB31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (527 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 254 ms
254 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 254 ms of main-thread work and 317 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,589 HTML elements
The page has 2,589 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
shopassistant-ai.com adds 162 ms
162 msshopassistant-ai.com costs a phone 162 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 89 KiBAbout 89 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 210 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
58 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 58 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 15 ms
15 msYour server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 27.7 s
27.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.4 s
6.4 sYour largest element takes 6.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 8.1 s
8.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.243
0.243The layout shifts by 0.243 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 309 ms
309 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 309 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 123 ms
123 msReal visitors wait 123 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 639 ms
639 msReal visitors wait 639 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 344 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 344 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (170), images 1.4 MB (14) and other files 897 KiB (129). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.44 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.44 g of CO₂e: 172.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
7 tap targets too small
7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names. (1 element).
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (8 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 61 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (215 characters)
Your meta description is 215 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
367 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 367 pages on rodneyclark.com and 6 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “RC & Co | Women's Affordable Fashion That Fits”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.rodneyclark.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rodneyclark.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.rodneyclark.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
6 pages without an H1
https://www.rodneyclark.com/pages/store-locator, https://www.rodneyclark.com/collections/new-arrivals, https://www.rodneyclark.com/collections/womens-clothing, https://www.rodneyclark.com/collections/t-shirts, https://www.rodneyclark.com/collections/jeans and https://www.rodneyclark.com/collections/shorts have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.rodneyclark.com/collections/pants, https://www.rodneyclark.com/collections/jeans and https://www.rodneyclark.com/collections/shorts took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 133 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
10 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
24 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Only about 49 words
The homepage has only about 49 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
35 calls to action
The homepage has 35 calls to action, for example “Shop By Style”, “Shop All” and “Shop By Collection”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and “15,751+ Reviews”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 8 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rodneyclark.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on rodneyclark.com, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.