Website review, no card needed

rohto.co.jp logo

rohto.co.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202634 issues · 82 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on rohto.co.jp, 10 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 47. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s1.1 sMay 9Oct 241.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.2 s
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
130 ms115 msMay 9Oct 24125 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026119 ms
May 16, 2026124 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026122 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026117 ms
Jun 20, 2026117 ms
Jun 27, 2026118 ms
Jul 4, 2026119 ms
Jul 11, 2026124 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026126 ms
Aug 1, 2026126 ms
Aug 8, 2026125 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026127 ms
Aug 29, 2026125 ms
Sep 5, 2026125 ms
Sep 12, 2026123 ms
Sep 19, 2026123 ms
Sep 26, 2026121 ms
Oct 3, 2026121 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026122 ms
Oct 24, 2026125 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rohto.co.jp (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rohto.co.jp at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. rohto.co.jp at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. rohto.co.jp at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. rohto.co.jp at 3.5 s3.5 s
  5. rohto.co.jp at 4.3 s4.3 s
  6. rohto.co.jp at 5.2 s5.2 s
  7. rohto.co.jp at 6.0 s6.0 s
  8. rohto.co.jp at 6.9 s6.9 s

Speed

9 to fix47
  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 56). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (wovn.io, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 761 KiB

    33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (761 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 471 KiB

    About 471 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    600 ms · 485 KiB

    13 images could be 485 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • wovn.io adds 808 ms

    808 ms

    wovn.io costs a phone 808 ms of main-thread work and 451 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 312 ms

    312 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 312 ms of main-thread work and 441 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • datasign.co adds 67 ms

    67 ms

    datasign.co costs a phone 67 ms of main-thread work and 377 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 74 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 74 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 195 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    31 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Minify JavaScript

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 147 ms

    147 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 147 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Your largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Make people happier, make the future brighter. - Learn more…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.8 s

    16.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 407 ms

    407 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 407 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 489 ms

    489 ms

    Real visitors wait 489 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.018

    0.018

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.018, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.8 MB in 155 requests

    3.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 155 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (31), images 1.1 MB (45) and fonts 1,006 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    vi_heart_sp.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (422 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.07 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.07 g of CO₂e: 127.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9796
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10076
  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “ロート製薬株式会社|公式企業サイト”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (192 characters)

    Your meta description is 192 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.rohto.co.jp/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at rohto.co.jp/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 98 internal links, 29 external

    The homepage links to 98 pages on rohto.co.jp and 29 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Connect for Well-being & Longevity”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rohto.co.jp/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    17%

    A phone browser shows 345 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 60. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rohto.co.jp/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.rohto.co.jp/news, https://www.rohto.co.jp/research/thought, https://www.rohto.co.jp/research/activities, https://www.rohto.co.jp/research/intellectual-property and https://www.rohto.co.jp/research/rd-library have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages with very little text

    https://www.rohto.co.jp/news, https://www.rohto.co.jp/heart, https://www.rohto.co.jp/company, https://www.rohto.co.jp/company/message, https://www.rohto.co.jp/company/philosophy and https://www.rohto.co.jp/company/location and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 70 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10078
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://cm.g.doubleclick.net/pixel?google_nid=treasuredata_dmp&google_cm&td_write_key=8151/fcd628065149d648b80f11448b4083528c0d8a91&td_global_id=td_global_id&td_client_id=963eef28-f922-4525-866e-22d26.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://rohtocdnst01-atbadkejf9c6hgaf.a03.azurefd.net/sitecore/Media/cojp2025/css/common.m…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    27 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 22 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 345 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 345 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rohto.co.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Azure

Company

Founded
1899
Headquarters
Osaka Prefecture

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on rohto.co.jp, including 14 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25