Website review, no card needed

Roku logo

roku.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202635 issues · 83 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on roku.com, 8 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

Read the full growth playbook for Roku

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.9 sApr 18Oct 33.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20263.1 s
Apr 25, 20263.1 s
May 2, 20263.1 s
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
157 ms125 msApr 18Oct 3150 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026129 ms
Apr 25, 2026129 ms
May 2, 2026129 ms
May 9, 2026131 ms
May 16, 2026134 ms
May 23, 2026133 ms
May 30, 2026132 ms
Jun 6, 2026133 ms
Jun 13, 2026134 ms
Jun 20, 2026135 ms
Jun 27, 2026136 ms
Jul 4, 2026136 ms
Jul 11, 2026136 ms
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026141 ms
Aug 1, 2026145 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026149 ms
Aug 22, 2026149 ms
Aug 29, 2026150 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026153 ms
Sep 19, 2026152 ms
Sep 26, 2026150 ms
Oct 3, 2026150 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of roku.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. roku.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. roku.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. roku.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. roku.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. roku.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. roku.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. roku.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. roku.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

3 to fix74
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 74

    74/100

    Your mobile performance score is 74 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 134 KiB

    About 134 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 125 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (125 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    145 KiB

    4 images could be 145 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 78 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 99 but mobile only 74. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Cloudflare), adding 10 KiB and 9 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 33 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “With setup that only takes minutes, a simple-to-navigate Ho…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 171 ms

    171 ms

    Real visitors wait 171 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix81
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    http://image.roku.com/w/rapid/images/home-v2-text-block/11cb is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    232 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example http://image.roku.com/w/rapid/images/home-v2-hero/e9a39d83-b at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 232 KiB.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (410 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.44 g of CO₂e: 52.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.6 MB in 32 requests

    1.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 32 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (19), fonts 221 KiB (6) and stylesheets 139 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 8997
  • 83 text elements with low contrast

    83 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Links look like plain text

    9 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9280
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (4 characters)

    Your title is only 4 characters: “Roku”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 55 internal links, 42 external

    The homepage links to 55 pages on roku.com and 42 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 134 characters

    Your meta description is 134 characters: “Roku provides the simplest way to stream entertainment to your TV. On your terms. With thousands of available channels …”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.roku.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.roku.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (269 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (15 KiB, 70 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

5 to fix67
  • 1 page without a title

    /deals has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 15 pages share a title

    /, /blog, /whats-on, /whats-on/subscriptions/roku-credit, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save/how-to-cut-the-cord and /what-is-roku/stream-and-save and 9 others all use the title “Roku”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /deals has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages share a meta description

    /blog, /whats-on, /whats-on/subscriptions/roku-credit, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save/how-to-cut-the-cord, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save and /products/roku-tv and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 14 pages without an H1

    /blog, /whats-on, /whats-on/subscriptions/roku-credit, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save/how-to-cut-the-cord, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save and /products/roku-tv and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 419 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 419 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at roku.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Astro
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Hiring

Hiring
118 open roles
Teams
225 - Advertising Engineering (20), 001- PIPELINE (17), 224 - Search & Recommendations (10), 383 - Ad Product (6)
Job board
greenhouse

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on roku.com, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25