Website review, no card needed
roku.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202635 issues · 83 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on roku.com, 8 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for Roku
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 150 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 74
74/100Your mobile performance score is 74 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 134 KiBAbout 134 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 125 KiB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (125 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
145 KiB4 images could be 145 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 78 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 99 but mobile only 74. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (Cloudflare), adding 10 KiB and 9 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.4 s
A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 33 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sYour largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “With setup that only takes minutes, a simple-to-navigate Ho…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 4.6 s
4.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
19 images without width and height
19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 171 ms
171 msReal visitors wait 171 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
http://image.roku.com/w/rapid/images/home-v2-text-block/11cb is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
5 images far larger than shown
232 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example http://image.roku.com/w/rapid/images/home-v2-hero/e9a39d83-b at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 232 KiB.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (410 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.44 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.44 g of CO₂e: 52.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.6 MB in 32 requests
1.6 MBYour homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 32 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (19), fonts 221 KiB (6) and stylesheets 139 KiB (4). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
83 text elements with low contrast
83 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Links look like plain text
9 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (4 characters)
Your title is only 4 characters: “Roku”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
6 links with vague text
6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
55 internal links, 42 external
The homepage links to 55 pages on roku.com and 42 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 134 characters
Your meta description is 134 characters: “Roku provides the simplest way to stream entertainment to your TV. On your terms. With thousands of available channels …”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.roku.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.roku.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (269 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (15 KiB, 70 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
/deals has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
15 pages share a title
/, /blog, /whats-on, /whats-on/subscriptions/roku-credit, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save/how-to-cut-the-cord and /what-is-roku/stream-and-save and 9 others all use the title “Roku”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
/deals has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages share a meta description
/blog, /whats-on, /whats-on/subscriptions/roku-credit, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save/how-to-cut-the-cord, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save and /products/roku-tv and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
14 pages without an H1
/blog, /whats-on, /whats-on/subscriptions/roku-credit, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save/how-to-cut-the-cord, /what-is-roku/stream-and-save and /products/roku-tv and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
2 small tap targets
2 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 419 words of copy
The homepage carries about 419 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at roku.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Astro
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Hiring
- Hiring
- 118 open roles
- Teams
- 225 - Advertising Engineering (20), 001- PIPELINE (17), 224 - Search & Recommendations (10), 383 - Ad Product (6)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- www.weareroku.com/home (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on roku.com, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.