Website review, no card needed
roland.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202646 issues · 90 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on roland.com, 15 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 183 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 182 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 182 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 222 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.9 s · 5.7 MB88 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.7 MB).
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Improve image delivery
550 ms · 2.1 MB35 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
610 ms · 121 KiBAbout 121 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.
Adobe TypeKit adds 19 ms
19 msAdobe TypeKit costs a phone 19 ms of main-thread work and 557 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Adobe Tag Manager and Adobe TypeKit and others), adding 919 KiB and 240 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 17 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 117 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
19 KiBAbout 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 535 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.6 s
24.6 sYour largest element takes 24.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Roland Boutique”.
Time to Interactive: 25.9 s
25.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.9 s
5.9 sThe first text or image appears after 5.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.1 s
8.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 219 ms
219 msReal visitors wait 219 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 222 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
38 images without width and height
38 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 95 ms
95 msScripts block the page for only 95 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 127 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 127 requests on a phone: images 5.5 MB (67), fonts 563 KiB (20) and scripts 375 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1,012 KiB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
34 images in older formats
34 images (5.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
22 images below the first screen load straight away
22 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.84 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.84 g of CO₂e: 220.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
49 tap targets too small
49 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (58 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 58 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (23 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 57 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (15 characters)
Your title is only 15 characters: “Roland - Global”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
9 H1 headlines
There are 9 <h1> headlines (“Roland BoutiqueJUPITER-08 + n/vision”, “TD-07 SeriesV-Drums” and “FP-40 with Piano SpherePlay. Discover. Progress.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (277 characters)
Your meta description is 277 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.roland.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
8 links crawlers can't follow
8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
119 internal links, 48 external
The homepage links to 119 pages on roland.com and 48 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.roland.com/global/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,162 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without an H1
/global/community and /global/social_media have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 75 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://static.roland.com/global/css/nav/navigation.css' from origin 'https://www.roland.c…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
20 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 306 words of copy
The homepage carries about 306 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Quick Start Video”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at roland.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Employees
- 3,060
- Founded
- 1972
- Headquarters
- Hamamatsu
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 46 issues on roland.com, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.